• DessalinesA
    22·
    3 years ago

    I don’t think so… we do allow necrobumping for the sort called New Comments, which is essentially a forum sort. And that’d be extremely useful for question and answer type communities.

    The default 2-day bump limited Active and Hot sorts keeps things fresh, and makes it feel like a news page, but the other sorts can turn lemmy into a forum, or who knows what else.

    • roastpotatothief
      4·
      3 years ago

      Slightly off topic but…

      Is a sort like “active since i last logged in” possible, of planned?

      … Ignore if too off topic.

      • DessalinesA
        5·
        3 years ago

        No, but we have a hide read posts option in your settings.

  • poVoq
    111·
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • DessalinesA
      7·
      3 years ago

      We do have a sort that allows necro-bumping, called New Comments, which is basically a forum sort. It would be ideal for use in 101 / question / answer type communities.

  • soronixa
    8·
    3 years ago

    I think letting the communiry moderators decide that would be good, since some communities like support ones would benefit, while there’s no reason not to archive posts on some others.

  • a_Ha
    6·
    3 years ago

    Some topics may evolve really slowly over time. it’s more compact to have a single post for a long lived topic than to create many posts with just 1 or 2 comments in each. Thought i am new to “lemmy.ml” i didn’t see any huge posts here (yet).

    Automatic close after 6 months + possibility of longer as need may be.

    • Gmork
      3·
      3 years ago

      I completely agree with your first point. I can’t count how many times I have visited a forum and found a thread that is answering a question almost identical to mine, but is missing one key piece of info that I need.

      I hate to make a new, almost identical thread for a simple bit of added info. I honestly can’t think of a good reason in favor of time locking a thread.

      If we had to however, I think your 6 month + longer as needed approach seems the most reasonable.

      • a_Ha
        1·
        3 years ago

        i stole the 6-month idea from :
        Travis Skaalgard https://lemmy.ml/u/tskaalgard in present tread. He says Reddit does it. As a rule of thumb, when a big player does something, there is a good reason. Maybe this reason does not fit in here but i wouldn’t know that.

  • sproid
    5·
    3 years ago

    Maybe in the future if the service becomes very popular a la reddit with more traffic.

    • Jeffrey
      4·
      3 years ago

      Agreed. As far as I’m aware gravedigging old posts hasn’t been an issue, yet. Maybe once a thread has been inactive for a 3-6 months a confirmation screen could be displayed explaining that the thread is inactive and users should only post if they are contributing something of value to the discussion.

  • gun
    4·
    3 years ago

    Reddit archives stuff after 6 months but I never understood why they did this

    • AgreeableLandscape
      6·
      3 years ago

      I remember them saying something about not wanting to have massive threads with hundreds of thousands or millions of comments, like how some long-term BB forum threads are. I wonder if it’s due to the possibility for server strain since Reddit (and Lemmy) uses a nested commenting system that needs to be loaded recursively, which is inherently much more computation intensive than single depth threads like on BB forums, or if it’s just a decision about the “style” of forum they want Reddit to be.

  • uberstar
    52·
    3 years ago

    Not a lot of people are fans of “necroposting” (if memory serves right, it means to post on a thread after being inactive for a long while). Worst yet, it’s probably less likely you’ll gain any responses from the same people that have posted in a thread long ago or from anyone really. I think if the time limit is not too long and not too short (so as to cover both bases) like say… 3 to 7 months till the post becomes archived, then it’d be acceptable. However, it’d be cool if instance maintainers get to control that feature since I’m sure they won’t be all agreeing on the same limit.

    Is there a time limit the lemmy devs/admins have agreed on so far?

    • Liwott
      4·
      3 years ago

      Worst yet, it’s probably less likely you’ll gain any responses from the same people that have posted in a thread long ago or from anyone really.

      The person commenting an old thread should be aware of that, so I don’t see what forbidding them to comment helps with.

      It also depends how a newly commented post is highlighted in usrrs’ feed.

      • uberstar
        2·
        3 years ago

        The person commenting an old thread should be aware of that, so I don’t see what forbidding them to comment helps with.

        See, the thing is, not everyone keeps that in mind before posting in an old thread. I’ve also made the assumption that the user expects a response from the og posters and/or OP, which might not necessarily be true.

        • Liwott
          2·
          3 years ago

          I do understand that, but forbidding everyone to answer the thread seems like a radical solution for this mild problem. Maybe a more appropriate solution would be highlighting the age of the post and of the last comment.

    • nutomicOPA
      3·
      3 years ago

      So far there is nothing like this implemented, thats why i’m asking. And yes the (default) time to close threads automatically is also an important question.