Invisível
link
510M

at least 3 percent

Metawish
link
510M

All I know, is that any whole number is probably more that what is currently spent, and any amount would make a significant difference.

Maya
admin
link
410M

… I dunno, keep pouring and I’ll say when

overflow
creator
link
1
edit-2
10M

deleted by creator

@kernelPanic
link
310M

I just wish no corruption

@pancake
link
210M

In my country there’s a social movement asking for at least 2%…

@tronk
link
210M

This is a lot of money, but I like it. Especially if it’s aimed at improving our lives through equity, inclusion, and sustainable growth.

Dessalines
admin
link
210M

Lets say 10 people in an economy (maybe in reality this could be 1 person = 10 million person-years, so a country with 100 million working ppl):

  • 5 on consumer goods
  • 3 on social services
  • 1 on research & development
  • 1 on defense
poVoq
link
6
edit-2
10M

10% on defense spending? That’s insanely high. Even the US only spends 3.2% of GDP directly on “defense”.

A Swiss like preparation for guerilla warfare that pretty much makes an invasion impossible (but no attack capabilities) is really cheap and much preferable.

P.S.: And you forgot about primary production ;)

Subversivo
link
110M

A peripheral economies must push the bar and get a higher percentage. But as the economy grows, the percentage can go down a little, as the absolute value is already big. But the real question is “What R&D?”. A low budget on public health is preferable to a high on mining industry for a poor country.

I am not an economist or whatever how should I know.

@peppermint
link
2
edit-2
10M

well its your money

@peppermint
link
010M

the question is ill-posed.

@tronk
link
110M

Huh. I’m sure you have good reasons, and I’m curious. Why do you think so?

@peppermint
link
-110M
  1. in my country tax is a way for the government to rob it’s citizens. the less paid the better.
  2. government is bad at supervising research, unless you have a specialised agency like DARPA, therefore see 3.
  3. it depends more on human resources than the amount of money you spend on it. give 50% GDP to a bunch of civil servants with 60% of them havong unfinished primary school education they will spend half of it on drying a local river. the other half will be cleaned by that very same river.
@ufrafecy
link
3
edit-2
9M

deleted by creator

A loosely moderated place to ask open ended questions

If your post is

  1. Open ended
  2. Not offensive
  3. Not regarding lemmy support (c/lemmy_support)
  4. not ad nauseam inducing (please make sure its a question that would be new to most members)

it’s welcome here!

  • 0 users online
  • 61 users / day
  • 166 users / week
  • 356 users / month
  • 678 users / 6 months
  • 2.53K subscribers
  • 830 Posts
  • 10.9K Comments
  • Modlog