Personally I think not having karma limits is nice currently! I understand why they were used but grinding karma as a lurker on reddit was frustrating.

    • gronapa@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yea that seems like something that started showing up more as time went on and more users joined. The trends and jokes did get tiring.

    • comfy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The comment “this” comes from sites that don’t have votes. The equivalent here is voting. It really is that simple.

    • hllywluis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This. I usually try to avoid commenting just “This” and try to give more explanation why I’m saying that. Feel like that’s the proper way of doing it.

      • gronapa@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 years ago

        Personally I am commenting and posting much more now than ever on reddit. I want to transition to lemmy and see it grow as I refuse to use the Android reddit app.

        I am not typing/imagining a comment and then not posting it here either like many people do on reddit. It seems like a good time to become less of a lurker.

        • hllywluis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 years ago

          Agreed, especially with how new Lemmy is, it just really feels like it needs our engagement to succeed and get more people to join.

          • Coolbootyjames
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 years ago

            I remember when I first got on reddit, it was still bigger than lemmy is now, but it still felt small enough that commenting actually felt worthwhile. Definitely excited to be here. Tryna engage as much as possible so people feel there’s a community to join

        • Candid_Technology_66
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          If I’m not mistaken, because lemmy by default sorts comments by newest, if you comment something more users will see it, but on reddit it’ll get stuck at the bottom.

        • PapaTorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah. Honestly I’m way more active here. Granted my whole time on the fediverse is like a week or two, but Ive made more comments today than I have in like a decade on reddit. I could easily see myself not returning to reddit.

    • bruh
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Add back the hardcoded slur filter but just for these kind of comments

    • XanXic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is what I wanted to post in here. Any version of the like “this” “to the top with you” “have my upvote” etc etc

      Like it’s a conversation board, I don’t care about one person’s personal opinion of a comment that actively takes away from the conversation and clutters the replies when there’s an entire feature around giving your opinion on a comment.

  • croobat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can’t wait for the screenshot of a Reddit post of a Lemmy post of an Instagram post about Elon tweeting some shit.

  • Riley
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Reddit has a longstanding reputation for being a hive of scum and villainy (like hosting the_donald for years, or kotakuinaction, etc). I really hope that Lemmy keeps with the general left-leaning vibes of the fediverse overall, hopefully being a good space for queer people, women, people of colour, etc.

    • Anomandaris@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think you do have to be careful here though. If you’re too permissive you allow bigotry, but if you’re too restrictive you cut off honest, good faith debate and create echo chamber silos where beliefs are never challenged.

      Bigotry should never be accepted but that means non-discriminatory opinions, especially ones you disagree with, should be allowed.

      • CynAq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Good faith is the key here. I’m all for disagreements leading to lengthy discussions and even some controversy as long as everyone is arguing in good faith.

        I can’t stand trolling, outright bigotry, and the normalization of literal fascist opinions as a mere “disagreement”. If a “disagreement” (you know which ones I mean) will lead to people dying if enabled, I’m pretty happy keeping those ideas out.

          • Riley
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            52
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 years ago

            Hi! I’m trans. If you’re looking to change your mind about that I’m happy to chat! Otherwise I suggest you look to get out of here as soon as possible.

          • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            39
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            That’s the beautiful thing about being a federated platform. You can create your own island and fill it with all the hatred and bad “science” you want. it’s worked for the British for centuries.

          • sparky@lemmy.pt@lemmy.pt
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’ve never understood the need to militantly oppose others’ personal situations when they have no impact on your own. Even playing devil’s advocate - what is the point of the hate? You don’t believe in gender identity, then don’t personally be trans. The fact that others may be would seem to have literally zero impact on you or your life. Why should Lemmy accommodate negativity that does real harm to people in sensitive circumstances?

      • andobando
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Who decides whats non-discriminatory.

        • Knoll0114@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Don’t know why people are downvoting you for this because that does actually matter. What is an opinion to some is discrimination to others (and this goes for any point on the political spectrum.)

          I guess the answer to that question though will be formed by the culture of the instances over time (although many instances do have explicit leanings already.) If you’re finding yourself consistently flagged for discrimination or whatever in one instance you can probably find one that you are better suited to (or re-evaluate your beliefs.)

    • CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      /r/jailbait needed a spotlight in the national news from Anderson Cooper to get dealt with.

      But (allowing for the fact that I’m still learning) by its nature I’m not sure the fediverse can stop these things in total, but the particular instances you subscribe to can. I’m unclear if INDIVIDUALS can ban instances (as far as I can tell they cannot) which I think might be a good addition. But instances can ban other instances, and eventually the fediverse will figure out which instances to put in the time-out corner for the rest of us, I think. But it will take time and might be a bit of wack-a-mole.

      • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think this is the big thing that Fediverse platforms are missing right now. If you want to be able to ban instances yourself, you have to run your own.

    • RedditTransfer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      That would be nice but these platforms with “instances” look like it’s a Reddit on steroids. I don’t see how a community could be shut down with the way it’s setup currently. I’m a complete newbie though so don’t rely on my unprofessional observations.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Your instance can ban the offending instances, so they won’t show up for you or your fellow users, and vice versa. It provides a good way to exile the offending community.

        • datavoid
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Do you know how the report button works?

          Does it send a report to the mods of your instance?

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I honestly have no idea. I’m just running my own instance so I’ll just ban any users from my federation feed if I need to.

            If you check the modlog page (link at the bottom of the desktop site), you can see what mods/admins have been doing recently (note that there is potentially offensive content there)

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Communities can’t be shut down, but they can be shut out. This is also just true in life in general.

        If The_Donald were to set up shop on Lemmy.ml, they could ban the instance and the members, but they could just turn around and join another instance.

        So, what do you do then? Site admins can ban the remote instance, and they can put pressure on the hosting site admins by threatening to defederate.

        Let’s say the new hosting site’s admin gives into defederation pressure and also bans the instance and its members. We’ll, then those people can set up their own server. Now, the admin won ban them.

        But none of the major servers will federated with them. They’ll be alone on their low population fashy instance (or not so low population - Truth Social is suppsoey the biggest Mastodon instance), effectively quarantined.

        That’s the best anyone can do. That’s true with or without Lemmy.

        • IverCoder
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Lemmy instances can also use users’ connections to DDoS other instances that are severly problematic (e.g. like KiwiFarms).

          While browsing peacefully, you can also do your part by sending a portion of your bandwidth to take down those instances.

    • dowhat@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      2 years ago

      So you want censorship of opinions you disagree with? Sounds pretty fascist tbh.

  • itchy_lizard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Posting pictures too much, including pictures of tweets or pictures of news headlines.

    Please link to the fucking article.

    • comfy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes! Many sumbreddits that actually had a point and were dare-I-say educational quickly became just twitter sceencap platitudes, on repeat.

      I get it, easy to read and agree with and upboat, but ultimately just dumbing the place down to the lowest common denominator and burying anything with effort or insight.

  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Getting banned in one subreddit you never participated in for daring to have a comment (regardless of the content of that comment) in another subreddit.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I see the same shit in the Fediverse though. Mastodon admins blocking a server just because they refused to participate in a shared block list.

      Someone’s going to make a script to ban a non-local user based on your remote posts, I guarantee it.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 years ago

        Isn’t the federated model specifically designed as a solution to undesired moderation? If a server is ban happy, users won’t go there. Problem solved?

        • oakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          The fact that opening a new instance still requires some technical knowledge is a difficulty facing the fediverse, since the venn diagram of people with the time and know-how to manage server administration and people who are knowledgeable on community moderation aren’t always two concentric circles.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 years ago

            But that’s not a task that is asked of a general user, even if their goal is to switch servers. If you don’t like gmail, the solution for an individual is almost never to start your own email server.

            • oakley@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              Correct. What i’m saying is that since federated networks tend to be more community run initiatives, moderators are gonna be people from within the community and the final say on moderation issues is gonna come from those who understand how the fediverse works and have done the work of setting up the servers that everyone is using. Which I’m sure can and has worked for plenty of Mastodon and Lemmy instances out there, but I’m sure there’s also instances where the head admin simply went haywire one day and nuked everything. It’s not that the system can’ work, it’s just that it isn’t really designed to gravitate towards experienced trust and safety experts being the ones that important decisions fall upon.

              I feel like I should clarify that I have nothing against any Lemmy mods or admins. They’re all being cool and helpful with onboarding reddit refugees like myself. I just think that this is an important thing to think about if we want this place to support more and more people and a growing number of communities in the future.

              • God@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                i’m not very sure if you mean that ppl with knowhow to set up a server are inherently already part of the system and therefore share certain opinions

                if you did mean that, i wanted to clarify that setting up a lemmy instance, as far as i have seen, is something that almost any senior developer could do because it’s very easy, and i as a junior developer was almost successful in my first attempt and i’m sure i could do it with a bit more time

                what i’m trying to say is that it’s not that hard and while it’s not at the any-user-can-do-it level, it is at the any-opinion-can-do-it level

            • oldindianmonk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I get you. But I’ve seen far too many users doing exactly this (starting their own mail server) in my programming circles. It doesn’t fare well tbh.

      • IverCoder
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Which is important if you don’t want the Fediverse to become the next Voat.

          • IverCoder
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 years ago

            Proactively banning problematic users before they cause issues is necessary. Prevention is better than cure.

              • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                On principle I agree with you, people shouldn’t be banned until they break the rules. But practically I can’t ignore the other guys point, it might not be fair to everyone but it certainly seems effective in protecting a given community from trolling

      • Cadendee [they/them]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        blocking whole servers because of disagreements over blocklists (not over the actual content of said servers) seems pretty silly. Banning users based on what they’ve posted just seems reasonable, at least in some cases. If they’re posting nazi shit over on some other instance but keep it only to wink wink nudge nudge dogwhistles on your instance where the rules are stricter, then its no huge loss to ban them for remote content. Quite the opposite in fact.

  • Lemmington@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The forced ‘inside jokes’ that filled so many threads, so many times you would see a post and be able to predict the top comment and its replies. Hoping that the lack of account karma helps with that.

  • lobemanet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Upvote/downvote counts mangling. Just show the real numbers, don’t mess with them with an unknown “algorithm”.

    • starrox
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      As far as I can see, the real number is already on top of the post. And then you have the split of up/downvotes near the arrows. So the “algorithm” is just basic addidion and subtraction. Someone correct me if I saw something wrong…

      • bappity
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think they’re referring to what Reddit did with not showing them separately

        • ShadowAether@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think they’re actually referring to the anti vote manipulation reddit function which adds random values to vote counts (you can see it if you refresh a post that you know people aren’t viewing like it’s old then you can see the count change on refresh)

      • minimar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s not what they mean, they’re referring to “score fuzzing”, a tactic Reddit used to combat vote manipulation. The number you see on a post or comment isn’t the actual number, it’s been fudged a little.

  • deva@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mods locking threads because “y’all can’t behave” jfc just ban accounts breaking the rules and let the rest discuss

    • minimar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      The reason they do this is so they don’t have to spend their entire life moderating a single thread.

    • GrindingGears@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      For real. I’m so sick of mod drama. 99% of the time, any sub drama boiled down to a mod freaking out over X

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      a big one for me. Coming across a big discussion late and not being able to interact because its been locked down. Mod failures

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Most trolls are posting on your sub for the first (and, if not banned, last) time in my experience, so bans to deal with a problem thread is fairly ineffective.

      Some subs will set posts “members only” or whatever they decide to call it, which is a nice compromise.

  • DevCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Mods who are running 10 major subreddits. It gives them too much power to steer opinions.

  • maporita
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Shadow banning… one of the most Orwellian moderation tools ever.

    • UsernameLost
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I never understood shadow banning. Just IP ban if you really don’t want that user coming back

      • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The original use case for Shadow banning was bots I think. To them it looks like they’re comments are still being posted, but everyone else it’s invisible.

        • thebestlettuce@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Which makes sense, I imagine if I was shadow banned i would realize pretty quick. But it’s not easy to have a bot realize they are shadow banned

        • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          given how that was such a dismal failure, I’m pessimistic about the future of the fediverse and its battle against bots

      • Aganim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        IP banning is such an annoyance if you are unlucky enough to only be able to deal with ISPs that do not use fixed IP addresses.

        “Can’t post today, because another random person got my IP ‘du jour’ banned in the past” is a pretty terrible user experience.

        And the pro troll uses Tor or a VPN and only needs to reconnect his client to receive a fresh IP address. I consider IP banning to be a very mediocre tool at best.

        • httpjames@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yep. So many ISPs use CGNAT now because of the rising costs of IPv4 addresses. And for IPv6, you can get a /32 block for free from Hetzner or other cloud providers.

      • Red Wizard 🪄@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not about making the user leave, because of they know they are banned they’ll try to evade. Shadow banning gives the desired effect while not tipping off the user. So they post away, to nobody.

        • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          A lot of the answers in this thread are things Reddit did to address specific problems that they encountered as the user base grew. Lemmy doesn’t have to make the same decisions, but it will inevitably encounter those same problems.

        • gnuhaut
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I pretty sure you can’t get someone’s MAC through a browser (through the app maybe), so I’m calling bullshit on this one.

          • maynarkh
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Also MAC addresses are trivial to change to the point where Windows had a privacy feature to connect to random wifis with random MAC addressed turned on by default. IDK if it still does that.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          How is that possible? On the app maybe? Generally all a website can see is your IP and whatever telemetry your browser sends back.

          • Hmm. Well, maybe my deductions are off. I used only RIF and a unique email address. Caught a ban. Remade account, banned within a few hours. Tried a week later, banned in a few hours. Gave up for a couple months then got a new device. Created an account, lasted for months. So I figured it was the device. Static IP. Email addresses the same just with a random number appended into it with a plus sign like just+283748w9293@emails.com. Wasn’t trying to hide.

            I found the site wide rule against violence to be arbitrarily and poorly enforced. I wrote a lot about legal history and specifically crime and punishment, and I guess my prose and rhetoric sometimes confused the admins into thinking I would ever endorse violence.

            Anyway, found it hard to find your reply here to comment back to you. Browning in jerboa. Could see your reply in the inbox but clicking on it didn’t bring up a reply option, just took me to the full comments. Had to scroll through your posts, you seem pretty chill and reasonable and thanks for making so many comments. I think it’s really about the discussions rather than the top level meme content.

  • Cal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    As a new community we need to identify and stamp out bad actors immediately and thoroughly (spammers, selfservers, ads disguised as posts, brigading, illegal content, racism, you get the idea).
    We can’t control if they create their own instances, but we can isolate them.

      • leanleft
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        this seems to be a good place to mention avoiding groupthink and trendy opinions. more fresh diverisity and bold independent thinkers.
        a flood of general americans would be worse than cultivating a niche counterculture initial userbase.

  • spin@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The power that the admins have. While most subreddit bans were justified, in my opinion, it just felt really off for them to have so much power.

    • mcc@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 years ago

      Here admin has even more power, except it is limited to their own instance. So it is more on the user to be prepared. You don’t want to be too attached to your data on a single instance. The instance might be abandoned, down, gone; the admin might go crazy. And the solution isn’t to have the admin be more reasonable. The solution is to hedge your bets on multiple instances and multiple communities.

  • fruitywelsh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mod culture is always odd to me. I kind of wish there was more community modderation, and less dictators for life running things.

    • gronapa@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Definitely a problem that comes with reddit and the unique subreddit names I’d say. I feel like that may not be avoided here since moving many subscribers from a large->small community is so difficult. Maybe the federation style will be successful though, I can’t say I have enough experience to predict that well.

      • SkoomaCat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        To be honest, I don’t think that’s entirely just a Reddit thing. Power tripping mods have been around as long as Internet forums have in general. It’s a tough one to combat for sure.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          As have complaints about legitimate mods from people who got banned. It is a complex issue even just to get the facts of the matter. Maybe some sort of public log of all mod messages and actions would help with that but then one would have to ensure that the people who like the deleted messages don’t just use the mod log as their new place to spread the content.

    • DevCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Shadowbans especially. Either ban a post or not, but don’t make the poster think everyone can still see it without explanation.

    • Andreas@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      The Fediverse already has these, there are lots of echo chamber instances that automatically block other instances for simply federating with the “wrong” instance (equivalent to those AutoMod bans on Reddit for posting in a certain subreddit). Since instance admins pay for their instances out of pocket, they are more restrictive with their instance’s allowed content than social media websites that want to cast the widest net. Eventually, there will be a massive split between communities, like how conservative and progressive Mastodon instances all block each other. Centrists can just have an account on each side of the wall.