You’re over here on the #3 most intolerant communist instance complaining about the #1 most intolerant communist instance.

Maybe find an instance that’s not specifically designed as a safe space for Marxism.

Part of growing up is being able to recognize your parents’ faults.

Whether to excuse your dad’s faults is a value judgement without right or wrong answers.

If you’re serious about helping the homeless, don’t spent scant attention antagonizing potential supporters over vocabulary.

So you’re not saying it’s because the wiring is substandard, but because it’s ring circuits, which are not up to the same standard as if they used a breaker panel.

Isn’t that the same thing?

Andreas Katsulas was also great as Ambassador G’Kar on Babylon 5.

What’s the next euphemism we should switch to?

For a while there in the 90’s, “differently abled” looked like it was next on the treadmill.

Words for stupid or crazy are always going to be used as insults.

Trump never pays his bills.

This is all for show with people he already stiffed.

Good bread is serious business.

If I was serious about multicolor I wouldn’t have bought a mono printer.

It made no sense to base a $300 purchase on the possibility that I might later spend $400 to upgrade it.

If I ever get serious about multicolor I’m going to want some sort of tool changer anyway.

What kind of question are you asking, exactly?

You just come off as confused.

Empathy is more personal emotion, while sympathy is more intellectual agreement.

I empathize with my family, I sympathize with the Palestinians.

It is high for a normal workforce, but the ATC pool has been greying for a long time because of a mix of neglect and mismanagement like we’re seeing right now.

Reagan made it a shitty place to work and Trump is stiffing them while taking away food stamps.

Basically 19th century Hells Angels on horses instead of hogs.

You were right the first time. Either word works.

Old languages should be able to learn new tricks.

Sweet, a new profile pic for me!

Hey @TheracAriane@thebrainbin.org it comes off as aggressively confrontational to reply to someone and @mention them at the same time.

A paternalistic video title on an old topic earns a downvote and no view.

If there is a thesis, that needs to come first or else why waste my time on old arguments?

And you’ve provided nothing to educate on the subject.

Maybe share the articles about the study?

You’re using very clickbait language but not giving the goods.