Personally I think not having karma limits is nice currently! I understand why they were used but grinding karma as a lurker on reddit was frustrating.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see the same shit in the Fediverse though. Mastodon admins blocking a server just because they refused to participate in a shared block list.

    Someone’s going to make a script to ban a non-local user based on your remote posts, I guarantee it.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t the federated model specifically designed as a solution to undesired moderation? If a server is ban happy, users won’t go there. Problem solved?

      • oakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that opening a new instance still requires some technical knowledge is a difficulty facing the fediverse, since the venn diagram of people with the time and know-how to manage server administration and people who are knowledgeable on community moderation aren’t always two concentric circles.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          But that’s not a task that is asked of a general user, even if their goal is to switch servers. If you don’t like gmail, the solution for an individual is almost never to start your own email server.

          • oakley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Correct. What i’m saying is that since federated networks tend to be more community run initiatives, moderators are gonna be people from within the community and the final say on moderation issues is gonna come from those who understand how the fediverse works and have done the work of setting up the servers that everyone is using. Which I’m sure can and has worked for plenty of Mastodon and Lemmy instances out there, but I’m sure there’s also instances where the head admin simply went haywire one day and nuked everything. It’s not that the system can’ work, it’s just that it isn’t really designed to gravitate towards experienced trust and safety experts being the ones that important decisions fall upon.

            I feel like I should clarify that I have nothing against any Lemmy mods or admins. They’re all being cool and helpful with onboarding reddit refugees like myself. I just think that this is an important thing to think about if we want this place to support more and more people and a growing number of communities in the future.

            • God@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              i’m not very sure if you mean that ppl with knowhow to set up a server are inherently already part of the system and therefore share certain opinions

              if you did mean that, i wanted to clarify that setting up a lemmy instance, as far as i have seen, is something that almost any senior developer could do because it’s very easy, and i as a junior developer was almost successful in my first attempt and i’m sure i could do it with a bit more time

              what i’m trying to say is that it’s not that hard and while it’s not at the any-user-can-do-it level, it is at the any-opinion-can-do-it level

          • oldindianmonk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I get you. But I’ve seen far too many users doing exactly this (starting their own mail server) in my programming circles. It doesn’t fare well tbh.

    • IverCoder
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is important if you don’t want the Fediverse to become the next Voat.

        • IverCoder
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Proactively banning problematic users before they cause issues is necessary. Prevention is better than cure.

            • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              On principle I agree with you, people shouldn’t be banned until they break the rules. But practically I can’t ignore the other guys point, it might not be fair to everyone but it certainly seems effective in protecting a given community from trolling

    • Cadendee [they/them]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      blocking whole servers because of disagreements over blocklists (not over the actual content of said servers) seems pretty silly. Banning users based on what they’ve posted just seems reasonable, at least in some cases. If they’re posting nazi shit over on some other instance but keep it only to wink wink nudge nudge dogwhistles on your instance where the rules are stricter, then its no huge loss to ban them for remote content. Quite the opposite in fact.