Do any of you have thoughts on a business case for continued use of Firefox for an individual?

Why? My employer is moving to uninstall all instances of Firefox on company computers for ‘security reasons’ in favor of Edge and Chrome. I would be allowed to keep it if I could make a business case for it. There is no legit reason why I can’t get my work done with another browser, but I am going to push hoping just being a squeaky wheel is good enough. My guess is folks on here will have clearer thinking on this than me. Does anyone out there think my IT dept is making a good decision?

  • @ajz
    link
    9
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • @SlatlunOP
      link
      53 years ago

      Good point. It definitely is true that I don’t need as privacy at work for my own good - I use my work device exclusively for work. Also, like you said, it is just about opting for open source whenever it is practical.

  • @2wT
    cake
    link
    83 years ago

    I think from the perspective of the IT department it makes sense to unify programs that people use. As I cannot really tell what your company does it’s hard to argue for it but if the company does something website related in IT you could argue that it’s important to test on all browsers to ensure that it works for all users. Aldo you could try to find information about data collection and how quickly security issues are fixed by each browser manufacturer.

    • @SlatlunOP
      link
      23 years ago

      That makes sense, and no, I have a completely non-tech job, so there isn’t a good use case for me like testing websites. I will see if there is compelling data on security fixes though.

  • @poVoq
    link
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • soronixa
      link
      63 years ago

      “so you want security?”

      takes the Qubes OS installation media out

    • @SlatlunOP
      link
      43 years ago

      You’re right. Put my device where my mouth is and start using my personal laptop to get work done. I am not to that point yet, but it is a good back burner idea.

  • Dwish
    link
    63 years ago

    In terms of security, the only major advantage that I know of for Chrome/Edge is that they automatically check for leaked passwords. Otherwise, an already up and running Firefox is just as good — if not better — than those two, so switching would likely be a waste of time.

    By the way, do you happen to know if there are any Firefox-exclusive extensions installed in your machine? That would make for the most compelling case, IMO.

    • @ksynwa
      link
      53 years ago

      By leaked password you mean they check if a website’s database was compromised and the data was sold? Firefox does that too.

      • Dwish
        link
        3
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        You’re right! I got Firefox Desktop and Firefox Mobile mixed up. The latter does not support this feature. My apologies.

    • @SlatlunOP
      link
      3
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      There aren’t any specific extensions on the computer. We are locked down tight in some weird ways, so I haven’t even tried to install any. For instance, I have icons on my desktop than need admin permissions to delete - some internal reporting shortcuts (sort of make sense) and adobe suite (of all things). They prefer a sledgehammer approach because they’re understaffed.

      edit: They’ve locked down extensions on Chrome, but the Firefox store is wide open.

  • @AgreeableLandscape
    link
    5
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    The Chrome extension store is riddled with malware and general scam extensions. Part of the reason is Chrome’s massive market share making it the most enticing target for browser extension malware authors. That said, Google absolutely has the man power and technical ability to combat it even despite the amount of activity the Chrome Web Store gets, but they barely bother to moderate their store at all.

    https://betanews.com/2014/01/23/chrome-has-a-malware-problem-and-google-needs-to-fix-it/ - this article is from 2014 and AFAIK it has not gotten much better. The article also mentions how Firefox is somewhat better in terms of moderating extensions. Full disclosure, I don’t know if Firefox has slackened their moderation policies in recent years, but I have not seen any reports directly stating that they have. Here’s are Firefox’s stated moderation policies, at least.

    https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/01/seeking-higher-ground-after-chrome-extension-adwaremalware-problems/ - also from 2014, also mentions Firefox

    https://www.wired.co.uk/article/fake-chrome-extensions-malware - from 2019

    • @SlatlunOP
      link
      53 years ago

      That’s as good of a reason as any not to use Chrome as far as I’m concerned. My folks have gotten around the problem by limiting the available extensions to just one - Acrobat.

  • @gmate8
    link
    13 years ago

    Yeah, happened to my dad. His company only allows Microsoft Edge.