i may be very naïve, but i genuinely have no idea what Reddit atheism is and how it differs from atheism in general

  • JohnBrownEnjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Atheism is simply a lack of belief in deities, nothing more, nothing less. I personally think that to say someone is an atheist is like saying that someone is a not-a-football player.

    What people mean by “Reddit atheism” or “New Atheism” or whatever other similar term is a particular brand of liberal, individualist atheists who make their bitterness toward religions their entire personality.

    They treat religion as the root of all evil— instead of seeing class as the main perpetrator of conflict and driving force in history, they see religion as that, even though religion is but one aspect (one that is ultimately inferior to class and surprisingly to a few others) of human societies and civilizations.

    The reason they get shit on so much is that they tend to be smug, sanctimonious, wannabe intellectual debatebros, and I’ve noticed that much of what characterizes the “Reddit atheist” also characterizes internet liberals.

  • Inkie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    A personal philosophy whose main tenet is “be annoying”.

    Annoy people who follow religions, regardless if they’re minding their own business or if they’re actually doing harm.

    Annoy other atheists for random bullshit.

    Basically, annoying people is its own reward. The point is to convince yourself you’re superior to other peeps.

    Though the RAYTHEIST community is no longer what it used to be. Most of the big names that kept it alive were absorbed into larger movements, mostly political ones. We now know them as “debate-bros”. There’s leftist debate-bros, rightist debate-bros, centrist debate-bros…

    • salarua@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      i’ve been called a debate bro before for asking for sources to back up claims of fact. is that a common debate bro tactic?

      • Inkie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Simply asking for sources doth not a debatebro make.

        There’s a certain smarmy attitude paired with self-importance that makes a debatebro.

        To be like, proper debatebro you have to be stalking people and demanding they debate you based on a statement they made days ago. You have to be sneering and asking for a source when they say that water is wet, even though water being wet is such a common piece of knowledge that the onus of proof should be on the one disagreeing. Shid like that.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Annoying atheism I think.

    Anyways, atheism is based as long as people aren’t annoying with it.

  • Tatar_Nobility
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Reddit Atheism, in a nutshell, is a perverted form of atheism that replaces religion with science as a dogma.

    • salarua@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      ah, i see. specifically, i see that the only religion they use to back up their claims that religion is bad is Christianity. no mention of Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. anywhere. so uh let’s see here…that’s a Texas sharpshooter fallacy (some people who are bad are Christians, therefore Christianity is bad) combined with an induction fallacy (Christianity is bad, therefore all religions are bad)? so much for the logic they claim to live by