Politically i dislike systemd, it just gives Red Hat too much control over GNU/Linux.
But functionally, systemd is an amazing… linux framework, let’s say, and as an operative system that rules over the supercomputer market and the server market, you need that. GNU/Linux has to be the most advanced operative system on earth since it operates on the most advanced fields. So it’s just natural that Red Hat wanted such thing.
- There is also Shepard, Guix’ init system.
- OpenRC still uses sysvinit under the hood as default I think?
- I really doubt any init is as fast as systemd especially under high load. Init freedom is still a good thing :)
- Links are “Unclickable for your security”? What? Is this about preemptive loading of links?
A lot of links on posts will lead you to the correct website, but add their affiliate links or promo codes. It’s always safer to just copy/paste.
Systemd is faster on good hardware, but booting with systemd on my hardware takes about double the time then it does with runit.
It’s always safer to just copy/paste.
Or you could read the popup of your browser.
Copy paste can actually inject code which isn’t visible so you’d have to paste into a text editor and then into the URL bar to be safe.
Guix is cool, anything that is written on common lisp/scheme is cool.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
As a service back end developer, systemd has made life easier. But I never worked with the others.
I’ve been happy with systemd but it’s good to have alternatives
Canonical’s was Upstart, iirc. No longer maintained.
They dropped support because systemd is superior.
True, but you have to take into consideration that when they made upstart systemd wasn’t a thing.