A lot of the things we do on a daily or weekly basis have ways of doing them that can either be private or communal, some of these which we do not think to consider as having that characteristic.

For example, bathing in the Roman Empire used to be communal, but then Rome fell and citizens in the splinter countries began taking baths privately.

Receiving mail is another example. There are countries which don’t have mailboxes and everyone gets their mail at the post office in the PO boxes. It was the United States which pioneered the idea of the modern mail system, which is why we associate it as a private act.

There are activities as well which don’t have any history as jumping between one or the other that might benefit from it, for example I think towns might benefit if internet was free and freely accessible but only at the local library.

What’s a non-communal aspect of life you think should be communal?

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cooking. Let’s all just cook one big meal each week and split it among 6 other people, and receive 6 meals in return.

    • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      You know, that’s not a bad idea. I only have to make one meal, but I get more variety in my food each day.

      I bet it’s easy to get going to, you only need a few friends / family / neighbours to get started

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s odd; I only enjoy cooking when I’m cooking for others. If it’s just me, I don’t give a fuck; pb&j, or I’ll order, or Soylent… Or I just don’t eat, much easier.

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m with you. I’m perfectly content making myself ramen or some pasta or even just a bowl of cereal and toast.

          But if I’m cooking for people, I’m actually putting in effort, dammit.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That’s fine; for me it’s more or less meditative to cook for myself. 3 years of food service was enough.

          I’m also fat so I can make things exactly to my personal tastes(awesome) and as much as I want (less awesome if not outright dangerous)

          And if i feel creative the only one dealing with the consequences is me

          • voracitude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah, I’ve never worked food service (which I view as privilege; it sounds like it would be very hard for me as I struggle with sensory overload and emotional overwhelm, even in less busy and stressful environments) so maybe that has something to do with it.

            I hear you on the creativity; while I was still young and learning, my ex-wife did refuse to eat my cooking after the second recipe I “modified” “creatively”. But really there was just too much lemon in the lemon chicken, and it’s not like it was mostly lemon. Just very lemony 😂

    • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Look, if I could get three or four more sets of hands to put down the maximum amount of cannabis plants in my backyard, know they’d participate in the cleaning post-harvest, and all I’d have to give up was a couple Oz’s per set of hands? God, I’d be growing more than two or three plants a season, wouldn’t I?

  • scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    A couple of ideas:

    • Home Ownership. I know condos exist, but it seems to me that we need a solution for home ownership that is accessible and ecologically viable. Traditional houses (and even duplex’s/townhomes) are massively inefficient from a climate perspective, not to mention the space requirements and cost.

    • Child rearing. In college, I learned that children were typically raised by multiple neighbors, in order to lessen the strain on parents. I think it is unrealistic and unhealthy to expect people to nearly kill themselves attempting to raise a child for the first couple of years.

    • Recreation space. I realize this is mostly an American thing, but lawns are a colossal waste of space. To be of any use at all, they have to be at least half an acre, and realistically, there’s no reason every single family needs their own outdoor recreation space. Plus, a tiny minority of people even use them these days.

    • GissaMittJobb
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know condos exist,

      What’s your objection to condos in this case?

      I live in an apartment co-op which in many ways is excellent. Highly efficient in both energy, economy and effort required from me. I’m not sure that I’ll ever want to live in a house, this is probably the ideal state for me.

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It may not be the case everywhere, but here condos are kind of a shit deal. They cost as much as a small house, they’re very difficult to sell, and the board can force you to renovate your unit out of your own pocket.

        The last one doesn’t sound bad, but a big reason to buy a home is to fix your living expenses for retirement, and being told to tear out your flooring because Shelly upstairs likes muave and all units must now have muave floors can be a real problem.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s worth pointing out the difference between condos and a co-op - here condos can be over 200k, which can be prohibive, whereas the buy-in for a co-op apartment is like 10k.

        Co-ops are truly the way to go for housing.

        • GissaMittJobb
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          200k or more is pretty normal for a unit in a coop here as well. Unfortunately.

          Financialization of housing was a huge mistake, one we will pay for the rest of our lives.

  • principalkohoutek [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cooking because it’s a pain in the ass to prepare food in small batches (for 1-3 people). Plus clean up It’s basically as much work to make food for 2 people as it is for 8.

    • tetris11
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t want to be a full time parent, but I’d happily teach an inquisitve kid the few things I know for a few hours a week

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been seeing that shift a lot recently. For instance, a lot of friends will work out a deal where their kids spend the day with their grandparents once or twice a week to save on day care costs.

      • mathemachristian [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nono I mean a full-on third, fourth etc. parent. Someone who takes care of the child basically from birth, who is as trusted as “mom” or “dad”. Maybe even a second person responsible for breastfeeding the child.

        • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          I dunno about that one, chief… I don’t trust people to not be weirdos or to be properly housebroken anymore. Certainly not westerners-- I’d have to do a full-on, US Government style background check on a mf before I was comfortable putting my child in another person’s hands.

          • mathemachristian [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Haha welcome to modern kindergarden/daycare and the commodification of child rearing.

            The only choice if you want your child to start socializing is which place. We visited the kindergarden based on recommendation, met the principal and toured the building. That’s how we made our decision.

            My wife met the teachers on the day he started, initially she went with him inside for a couple days but later left him there for a few minutes, then hours and then just brought him there and left.

            He did not enjoy that! “Yes my child I know mom and dad were your lifeline in this world that you wouldn’t survive otherwise for your entire life but now this stranger we met a week ago is responsible for that, she seems fun no?”

            And these people will be responsible for a huge part of his education. They don’t know about veganism, best compromise was vegetarian (yes fish counts as meat!) and hopefully they aren’t to into cutesy copaganda.

            • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Haha welcome to modern kindergarden/daycare and the commodification of child rearing.

              Like that, you just described why I haven’t had kids and frankly don’t plan on 'em, at least in part lmao. Like… If against all odds, we still lived in the same America that we did when my mother was running me through kindergarten? If I lived in a neighborhood where most of the people that lived there looked and lived in the same general rung I do? It’d be less of an issue; but even theoretically knowing where the offenders in my city are, I can’t trust that 1) offenders are actually made to reveal themselves 100% of the time anymore or that 2) that the faculty isn’t that way and just ain’t been caught yet.

              Een beyond predation, you bring up ANOTHER salient point as to why I’m not; see, it hit me a few years back before my personally-childfree philosophy really crystallized was that your child is only really yours maybe the first 5 or 6 years of their life. After that, your child will spend more of their waking hours at their school than they do around you. Effectively, past the age of 6, your child is a ward of the state and at hazard from whatever fuckery their peers get into-- never mind the Amerikan-exceptionalist brainwashing from the teachers who will end up shaping their lives more than you will. You’d end up spending more time trying to undo the rot they’re learning with no real surety that what you’re trying to teach your seed will stick in the face of teachers and peers. Hell, the only reason it halfway worked on me was because my mother’s boyfriend was an abuser for the first ten years of my going to school; so if you’re actually a well-adjusted parent, you’re only really swimming harder against the current our system orchestrates.

              I pray you luck in guarding your own in this day and age, my man.

              • mathemachristian [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I mean something every parent needs to learn is that your kid will always be more exposed to danger than you would like.

                Like we were very cautious with how he slept the first year since that’s how most infants die because they can’t roll on their backs and have trouble lifting their abnormally sized heads. Then while I had duty one night sleeping next to him I wake up and see him lying on his belly. His face was turned to the side, so he had no trouble breathing but that’s a big yikes so I turn him back around. When I wake up in the morning I see his sleeping bag got bunched up in a weird way and in the dark and sleep haze I misread the situation and turned him from his back on his belly!! I would not have noticed if he had turned his face into the mattress and died until the next morning.

                Kids can die so easy. Food that’s slightly off but you don’t notice it, unknown allergy, choking hazards, unsecured furniture, stumbling and falling on their head etc. It’s impossible to think of everything. At some point I just had to face the fact that he could just randomly die unless I lock him in place and feed him mush.

                So instead I let him climb the big slide by himself, give him some apple, let him help putting glassware away knowing he could die or severely be injured if he made a slight mistake but having to trust him and support him if he wants to try something new (within reason of course).

                And so to me this is a lot like this. He could die, he could get severely injured/traumatized, he could get be irretrievably suckered into the propaganda around us. Those I just don’t have control over and I need to trust him and hope for the best. He is a very bright kid, and I am trying to synthesize what primed me for radicalisation so I hope that I can pass that along. But in the end there I have next to no control of the future.

                But I do wonder sometimes how my life would have turned out if I had been radicalised before marrying, or before becoming a dad. Because I am scared of what is to come when the beast dies. This country is such a grateful assistant to the hegemons crimes, if it asks for my son they will grab him and make him march. Ukraine should be a warning to everyone here in europe. If I had no other obligation I would probably be learning chinese right now. That’s the reason why I’m looking to get the hell out of here, the other dangers probably exist everywhere in the world, some more, some less. But I can feel the vibe shifting among “my fellow” working-class whites. Or maybe I have become more alert to it, either way I know the beast is still there and there is so much effort being put into feeding it and hiding it.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    In the US, nudity. People get really weird and obsessive of bodies when nudity isn’t exercised at places like beaches, changing areas, etc.

    It’s not healthy to only see bodies as sexual because they are always covered up in public and then 100% sexual either in the bedroom or in porn. There has to be a gradient. Everything in moderation.

    • RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel like people are also a lot more insecure about their bodies because the only other naked bodies they ever really see are the perfect bodies in movies and porn. Nudity wasn’t a big deal in my family growing up and I think I owe a lot of my positive body image to that. I don’t really have any insecurities, even after being pregnant twice.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree. Most people kinda look similar. And you kinda tune it all out anyways once it becomes mundane.

  • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Community canneries still exist, but they used to be way more popular. In rural communities where people grow a lot of their own food, people can their own food, but pressure canners take a lot of time for a single batch to come up to pressure, cook, and cool.

    Community canneries have much bigger pressure canners where you could feasibly can everything in one batch. It’s also really enables people sharing surpluses, trading, etc.

    Many hobbies are better shared, too. If you have 20 people sharing a super high quality “item”, they will have a better experience than if each of those people had to buy their own crappy versions.

    Basically, a whole lot of things can be “libraried”.

  • random@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    simple tools like guns, hammers, screwdrivers etc. I still think you should be able to own them in case you need them more often or don’t have the time to get them due to an immidiate repairing. But I’ve read some lemmy post where some guys public library offered tools and I think that’s a great idea

    • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also look for makerspaces, they provide all kinds of tools but it’s expected that you work on projects there and not at home. Not sure if you can borrow stuff.

    • GissaMittJobb
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      We had that where I grew up, but mostly heavier machine tools like stuff to cut firewood, trailers to haul stuff etc. Cost just $10 a year and you could borrow it as much as you needed. Banger of an idea to be honest.

  • wicked@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    The US started using mailboxes 14 years after the UK

    In 1849, the Royal Mail first encouraged people to install letterboxes to facilitate the delivery of mail. Before then, letterboxes of a similar design had been installed in the doors and walls of post offices for people to drop off outgoing mail.

    In 1863, with the creation of Free City Delivery, the US Post Office Department began delivering mail to home addresses.

  • davelA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Private property, specifically your toothbrush, comrade.

    There’s always someone who doesn’t know so I’m contractually obligated to say that by property we mean the means of production and not any other personal belongings.

  • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    It was the United States which pioneered the idea of the modern mail system

    The UK had a general post office that deliverd to individuals over 100 years before the USA was founded. The US postal system is based on the UK one that delivered their mail before the US’s founding. Why on earth would you think the US pioneered it?