

Showing people irrefutable proof of something will change their minds.
Actually, this town has more than enough room for the two of us
He/him or they/them, doesn’t matter too much
Marxist-Leninist ☭
Interested in Marxism-Leninism? Check out my “Read Theory, Darn it!” introductory reading list!
Showing people irrefutable proof of something will change their minds.
If “tankie” means general leftist, ie Anarchists included, then maybe. If “tankie” means Marxist-Leninist, then that’s Lemmygrad.ml
The two biggest spaces for trans users are lemmy.blahaj.zone and hexbear.net, hexbear is larger but is explicitly Communist/Anarchist, while blahaj is more liberal/progressive.
It’s all I’ve had to work with, as is your opinion. I don’t think we are ever going to align.
You never spell anything out, it’s all semantics for you. Legitimately, your only work so far has been to change the nature of a thing by changing its name. I’m unsurprised that you don’t agree with Politzer if this is how you genuinely view concepts.
I am applying them correctly, and it’s important, your shift in definition of them is more semantical than functional. You think the name of a concept is the driving factor in what it is, functionally. I can point you to Georges Politzer’s Elementary Principles of Philosophy if you don’t trust my knowledge of philosophy.
When it comes to your argument, “Ownership” is just an authority position recognized by the state as falling under that term. There’s no functional requirements or powers. This is an absurd definition that adds confusion, rather than clarity. A society where “owners” have no actual ability to buy or sell what they “own” and who are selected by society to “own” rather than by virtue of posession aren’t owners at all. They are administrators and managers that society has chosen to refer to as “owners” despite not being such in any traditional capacity, and by “traditional” I mean in all of history.
This form of “ownership” is so far divorced from the common meaning of the term that its only purpose is for the semantical game you’ve decided to play.
Blowback is incredible, and has ads only at the beginning and end, so very skippable. I can’t recommend Blowback enough. Each season covers the “behind the scenes” of different US atrocities, from the Iraq War, to Cuba, to Korea, to the Afghan War, to Cambodia. Any USian needs to listen to it especially to truly understand how and why US foreign policy acts in the manner it does.
Yea lol, was a joke more than anything.
Likely not on Lemmy.ml, different admins and mods.
Huh, that’s strange. Why active users specifically? Telling me to touch grass?
Wait, the catfish happened to a bunch of people? Thought it was just a few, I ignored it when I got it.
What’s an example of NSFW that you want to see that is banned by instances banning porn? Which instances are you referring to?
What comes with this ownership? What “rights/obligations” do I have?
In my opinion, you are defining ownership as “any authority position that is called ownership.” I don’t think this is useful, at this point you are attempting to define the nature of a concept by the name we call it. This is idealism, not materialism, ie this believes ideas create reality, rather than the inverse.
So if I write down on a piece of paper that I own the US, I do? What are these “rights/obligations” that are sufficient for ownership?
Please explain why and how your “owners” actually own if they have no actual ownership, and purely serve as administrators and managers. Can they, or can’t they, sell or buy more Capital? What are these “rights” they have that are sufficient for ownership?
Maybe the other things we say have merit too! Haha.