This seems to be becoming the hot topic, the elephant in the chatroom - the balance between censorship / freedom of speech on lemmy. There are solid arguments for both ways, and good compromises too.

IMO the FAQ makes it quite clear what the devs have built here, and why. But recent discussions, arguments, make it clear that a lot of the most vocal users object to it.

I’m very curious. Many active users feel this way? Please vote using the up arrows in the comments.

  • DessalinesA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    I’d like to add that many projects besides ours have codes of conduct, and anti-bigotry rules. For the bigots, its not just the enforcement of those rules, but the mere existence of them that turns them into whiny babies. They get kicked out of nearly every space and are begging to have a platform to spread their bigoted views.

    We will never give them one, and will do everything in our power to keep them marginalized and isolated.

    • abbenm
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      For the bigots, its not just the enforcement of those rules, but the mere existence of them that turns them into whiny babies.

      I’ve said this several times before, but one of the reasons I joined lemmy, and want to keep it active, is because I appreciate the values being brought to the project. It’s not just activitypub, but the kinds of people who are involved in the best projects, that are the among the reasons why I want to be on platforms like this.