title

  • Jassu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 years ago

    How does this work with upcoming federation features and de-centralised nature of the lemmy platform?

    • DessalinesA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 years ago

      A community is still ultimately controlled by the instance where it lives, along with those admins and mods.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 years ago

          The reality is that they can already do that with plenty of existing services. Lemmy isn’t providing a new an unique opportunity for nazis to communicate that wasn’t available to them previously.

          That said, the moderation and federation rules do appear to work in practice as seen with Mastodon where similar concerns have been raised. The one nazi instance is its own bubble, and nobody federates with it.

        • diorama
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 years ago
          related: isolated gab

          A few weeks ago you could find Gab (neo-nazi/white supremacist leaning instance) at the top of this list about most of the instances in the fediverse. Gab was a huge instance: ~1mln accounts, i.e. ~2x the number of accounts of Mastodon flagship instance. (numbers were inflated btw)
          Why did Gab leave the fediverse? Because the rest of the fediverse campaigned to de-federate a neo-nazi/white supremacist instance. At the end of its story in the fediverse, Gab had an estimated insularity of 99.3% (source): that means 7 messages out of 1000 were directed outside that instance. The estimation is an upper limit, including outwards messages that actually cannot reach other instances (since these instances suspended Gab).
          Now, according to the source above, Gab devs are discussing to drop the support for the fediverse. In the meantime, it is an insular instance.