☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
- 18.6K Posts
- 16.9K Comments
1·1 hour agoAgain, go ahead and explain what the paper about this specific jet gets wrong. Also, nobody is asking your to be anybody’s butler. You made a claim, so now it’s up to you to substantiate it.
I find it absolutely hilarious how arm chair aeronautics engineers such as yourself just assume that people building this stuff aren’t aware of obvious arguments that even a layman such as yourself understands. Like it took your galaxy brain to figure this out, but the people actually making the jet aren’t aware of this. Sure little buddy.
21·1 hour agoNo, I’m literally posting about a procedure that has high success rate in China while being questionable in Europe. The fact that this needs to be chewed up for you is phenomenal.
Well since you obviously must be an aeronautics engineering expert, perhaps you can explain what aspects of the paper aren’t credible for a dumdum like me
Honestly, I was really shocked just how relevant stuff from Marx and Lenin was today when I started reading it. So many political debates we’re having in the west today are mirrored there, and it’s really too bad that so much of this stuff was effectively forgotten. Glad to see posting this stuff helps.
I guess we’ll see won’t we. Pretty much same thing was confidently said about lots of technology in modern use, like the high speed train network in China. Plenty of western geniuses derided it as not being cost effective.
Just a sad racist.
Oh wow that sounds like a big deal, what percentage of 1.4 billion is that again? 🤡
It did
4·9 hours agothis has to be one of the weirdest stories of late
The former chief of NATO has already admitted that the war started due to NATO expansion, go peddle your propaganda somewhere else
The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that.
The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second class membership. We rejected that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders.
I don’t think they’re in control of anything in practice. It’s pretty much the same situation as Afghanistan. Turkey and Israel unleashed a whole bunch of extremists to overrun the country, but now it’s going to be impossible to control them in any meaningful way.
I imagine similarly to how Russia normalized relations with the Taliban. They’ll just work with whoever ends up in charge when the dust settles.
It’s more that reading exercises specific parts of the brain. In particular it develops the anterior temporal lobe, responsible for associating and categorizing different types of information and the auditory cortex, that’s correlated with better reading skills, becomes thicker since it’s involved in phonological awareness in reading. Basically, reading is good for you.
1·12 hours agoYeah, WASM definitely looks promising. It’s also worth noting that you can treat Js as a compile target using something like Elm or ClojureScript. These languages have decent semantics that insulate you from a lot of the underlying insanity. For example, stuff like equality works the way you’d expect it to. I’ve worked on a few large frontend apps with ClojureScript and it was pretty nice as long as you didn’t need to interop with the Js ecosystem.
Pointing out the obvious always makes libs so mad.
Coroutines are indeed much easier to work with, and I find it shocking that they didn’t catch on in Js world. In general though, I find plain sync code is just much easier to reason about and far less error prone. If you can keep IO at the edges, async’s not too bad, but in a lot of cases you need to do some IO deep within your logic, and that’s when things start to fall apart. Now you have to make everything async, error handling in particular becomes a pain. I think having async is nice as an opt in, but it shouldn’t be the default.
Those are the arguments I’ve seen most commonly as well. In practice, I don’t find they hold up in practice either. The downsides of having a janky foundation for the backend far outweigh any perceived benefits of having a single full stack platform. Also, async style is just far more painful to work with.
Kind of, the good news here is that we have lots of historical record and political theory we can study to understand the moment we’re living in now. We could save a lot of debates on how to move forward if we can get more people to read this stuff.