I want to stop using WhatsApp because I fuckin hate it. Does anyone use XMPP regularly? It allows encryption so I was considering it.

The consideration is whether I will have to self host it or I can use some publicly hosted instances (like how there are open Matrix instances). Also whether it has support for desktop clients that run natively on Loonix without electron.

Please share your thoughts if you have experience. Feel free to suggest other alternatives too. I won’t mind that.

  • karoshi
    15·
    3 years ago

    I use it for daily communication with my friends and family and think it’s one of the best choices for IM.

    There are a lot of public servers, but - as with every non-centralised protocol - choosing the right one might be tricky. This list provides a good starting point imho: https://list.jabber.at/ Also you might want to check, that your choosen server is fully compliant with the current xmpp standards, which can be done at https://compliance.conversations.im/

    Last but not least, if you want to have a look at self-hosting, there is this fairly new project called snikket (https://snikket.org/) which aims to make xmpp hosting easier (and also the whole xmpp usage a bit more consistent for “normal” users by rebranding the protocol and it’s apps under a single name), but uses a standard xmpp server in the background.

    As for the clients, I use dino (https://dino.im) and gajim (https://gajim.org) on my Linux desktop and Conversations on Android.

        • ksynwaOP
          1·
          3 years ago

          Yeah a couple if you don’t mind.

          1. Is it resource intensive for a small number of users? Mainly want to use it with my family members. I have a bottom tier VPS so I am wondering if I need to get a better.
          2. Is it tricky getting it to comply 100% with the standards expected by compliance.conversations.im ?
          3. How much effort does it take to maintain it?
            • phthalo
              2·
              3 years ago

              I’m also running prosody and can confirm everything you said. Prosody is surprisingly lean and snappy. I remember being concerned about getting prosody to be compliant (after coming from ejabberd, which has everything built-in), but it was very straightforward. I don’t know if that last 5% compliance is worth it for a self-hosted server. I think an invitations-based system works best for in-band registration, but as far as I know that won’t satisfy the requirement of being “open.”

          • Helix 🧬@feddit.de
            2·
            3 years ago

            Is it resource intensive for a small number of users?

            No. Prosody is very resource friendly, especially for a small group of users. You can easily run it on a first generation Raspberry Pi.

            Is it tricky getting it to comply 100% with the standards expected by compliance.conversations.im?

            I think you just have to enable some modules in the config. I’m sure there’s a guide on how to do it somewhere.

            How much effort does it take to maintain it?

            Less than Matrix-Synapse. You set it up once with all the modules you liked through the package manager of your OS and then you just auto update and forget it. Of course you should do regular backups of the data it stores, but apart from that you should be fine.