• 3 Posts
  • 193 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 25th, 2021

help-circle
  • PP44toMemesNon-political Meme
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Here I am trying as hard as I can to find a political take on this post, just to troll.

    Let’s go with a meta one : attention is limited, trying to orient peoples attention towards meaningless memes actively participate in silencing more important topics.


  • PP44toPrivacy*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Many many things, but the main one are probably :

    • Many French activists, from orgs like “framasoft”, “la quadrature du net”, or just from group of people like “les exégètes amateurs”
    • the Aaron Swartz “case”
    • the Alexandra Elbakyan “case”
    • Snowden, Wikileaks, etc.
    • Self hosting and how I think I information should be managed.

    Bonus story : I dislike religions a lot, so I don’t talk about it often. But one day, I and a heated and interesting debate with a christian. First time in month where I talked so much about Jesus. The next hour or so, the first ad I get on YouTube (before I knew how to block them efficiently) was evangelist bullshit. First time I ever saw something even close to this. I didn’t even imagine such ads existed.






  • Of course. Tbh, US imperialism made it more difficult to get rid of their surveillance than China’s one (at least in western countries). And Europe have a lot of trouble acting politically, and I think it is mostly because they are so liberal. Even more so than the US, that limit liberalism to the thing where it is an advantage to them, but are very protective and prostate control when it benefits their political objectives.

    I have to admit that Europe is not 100% passive, and some regulations do try to limit US dominance on Europe, but it is very far from being enough, or even close to what could be done with a real political will.





  • PP44toPhilosophy*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I kind of agree with your 2 last sentences. But you don’t have to simulate the whole universe. You just have to compute an approximation that would be credible to a single subject. And that is a much much much lower bar. You can make gross approximation about the large majority of the universe without the subjetct being able to detect this !





  • PP44toMemesWhen you're wrong about Elon Musk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    OK, I see a lot of post/shitpost about that, but is it that real ? Do you think migration toward Mastodon will last ? Will it be enough to create a long lasting positive momentum ? Or will people slowly leave to other proprietary social networks, or even back to Twitter ?


  • I think it is voluntarily weighted more heavily towards time than upvote compared to other sites like reddit. The reasoning being (I think) that it allow more diversity and less “snowballing” where the most active user just arrive first, get the upvotes, and stays on top. Effectively killing the possibility of a late very pertinent comment to ever climb up.

    I think this is a very difficult equilibrium to find, and it has serious implication on how discussions are built. But I really think Reddit has the opposite problem. Come to a post a few hours/days late, and you will never be heard. I create FOMO and pushes user to come back often. This is to me a business model for sure, but not the best way to organize online asynchronous discussions.


  • I think I agree with you. I would go as far as saying this is true for everything, not only for science. I think we need to have categories to be able to grasp complex problem. And almost all of the time, those categories are arbitrary and only useful at specific scales and in specific context. It is the only way to think about large scale problems, just because we cannot handle every individual information in too large quantities.

    Those categories are always “wrong” in some sense, but can be “useful” to understand our world. And I agree with you, at individual level, in our society, for sure sex at an individual level is not only useless but harmful.

    Sorry, I recognize my position was unclear and could be taken for quite essentialist. Hope this clarify my position.




  • In everyday life, not much to be honest. Gender is the useful information in society. Male and female are useful in biology, and therefore in medicine. They are useful broad category that should be use as such. Broad tendencies that have many exception and complex interactions. But are nonetheless pertinent to understand how our body works and how to treat some diseases.

    But of course 99% of every uses fall outside of what is pertinent, and it should become a technical scientific term only.