- cross-posted to:
- privacy
- cross-posted to:
- privacy
You must log in or register to comment.
deleted by creator
Its definitely not irrelevant that signal was funded and may still be funded by the US government. That no one seems to dispute that, and think that there’s no conflict of interest between the worlds biggest abuser of digital privacy funding the supposedly secure apps they use every day, is boggling to me.
deleted by creator
One difference is that matrix is self hostable, while signal isn’t. And signal only updates their server source code when they received a massive backlash for not updating it in over a year. https://community.signalusers.org/t/where-is-new-signal-server-code-why-not-share-signal/15068/9
The foss community hates them for good reason.
matrix is self hostable, while signal isn’t
You can indeed self-host your own Signal server, it’s just that the effort required to do so is significant and it doesn’t federate. Far easier to just use XMPP/Matrix.
The Tor project is also funded by the us government, that doesn’t make it less secure.
With open source software you don’t need to trust that nothing shady is going on in its source code.
Tor has decentralized nodes, signal is a single central server with no verification of what’s running on it ( that also uses phone numbers, which are tied to you identity, as its primary identifier). Also as a US company it’d be illegal for them to disclose if their server has been compromised.
deleted by creator
You don’t need to trust the organisation if you can see the code. And the way the signal apps are built you don’t need to even see the source of the server because you can verify that everything is properly encrypted in the client.
deleted by creator
signal is not anymore open source, u know shit about what is there and the fact that its crypted by client its just thw way how to make it look transparent.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
i doubt many people are going to buy their book.
ಠ_ಠ
