• SkyNTP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Protest voting doesn’t work when the candidate you are protesting is the least worst option. Democrats that will not vote out of principle have been conned as badly as MAGA republicans. End of story.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think you might be on to something. Maybe the system is set up to limit the power of protest voting? I mean, it does deliver two right-of-centre parties to power, over and over again.

      Where the wheels are coming off is that one of them - and some people say both - are moving further rightwards, and this is destabilising society in America.

      • OptimalHyena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        Some people say… Dems are generally shit but they have definitely moved left over the last decade. A lot of new people have run and while it isn’t a sure thing by any stretch, people have been able to and have the chance to continue to move the party and also just straight up infiltrate it to push it left. Whereas the repubs have been in full sprint to the right.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Maybe the system is set up to limit the power of protest voting?

        It absolutely is set up that way. This may or may not have been the intent of our election system, but it is the outcome.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Maybe the system is set up to limit the power of protest voting?

        Not everything is some conspiracy to keep you down. The people who wrote the constitution just weren’t perfect and had to make political compromises, which resulted in an imperfect system.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Also, the game theory that gives us insight into voting systems, telling us the current system leads to a 2 party system, did not exist when the US constitution was written.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Young people don’t get involved in the system and don’t vote, nothing special about the US on that level, so it’s not surprising their priorities aren’t the priorities of the political options.

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Not voting for a candidate is not the only, nor the most effective way to push a party to change positions on an issue you care about.

  • SoJB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    47 minutes ago

    Holy hell, you liberals really have gone completely off the rocker in your corner of Lemmy, huh? I mean, Jesus Christ the shit I am reading in these comments is completely insane.

    “Everyone I disagree with is a foreign agent”, say the people whose same views Israel are literally running bot farms about.

    “Trump would be worse”, say the people who have admitted that the genocide of Palestine is an acceptable means to an end, as if queer folks are supposed to believe you won’t be their next tool of convenience to be discarded.

    “Look at all these policy differences”, say the party who brag about being half Republicans and use their policies.

    Y’all are going to lose, and it’s not going to be because of the 100 US leftists on Lemmy.

    I’m sure you’ll blame us anyway though, because liberals have objectively abandoned reality.

    Look at yourselves. You’ve become MAGA, and don’t even try to deny it. This is the shit you made fun of Republicans for doing for 4 years of Trump. I thought Democracy was about winning votes, not demanding them under threats of violence? Or is this another one of PugJesus’ cronies?

  • Bobmighty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If you want to engage those bad faith accounts, don’t respond to the Gaza thing; that’s a trap. Instead, ask about other issues like climate issues, housing issues, food insecurity problems, etc. ask them what their third party candidate has planned for that and ask for evidence of these plans. They’ll move goalposts and attempt to get back on Gaza. Keep them coming back to those other issues that affect Americans daily. Many of those accounts are here to derail conversation. Derail them in turn and force the conversation back on track.

    Or do what I do and downvote then block, then post the occasional reminder that most of those accounts are bad faith at best.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I know. I mean I’m not a huge fan of Harris’ Gaza stance. Honestly I’m not sure why it’s political at all to call what Israel is doing wrong. But come on, Trump will be 100 times worse. And that’s just on the Israel/Gaza thing. I’m not sure how you can look at these two and decide that Harris is wrong enough about the Gaza thing that you come to the conclusion that either a third party or Trump vote is warranted. Which makes me believe is not genuine and likely foreign agent spreading chaos and misinformation.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s because there is a large, internally-polled segment of the Pennsylvania electorate who are Jewish and sympathetic to Israel.

        Harris can’t afford to not court them.

        I have no doubt she vehemently dislikes Bibi and would wish to cut aid.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          Not only that, but AIPAC is a serious force that has demonstrated their willingness to aggressively smear every candidate who speaks out against Israel; they’ve already done this for a number of races.

          Harris is basically trapped here. The best thing she can do is stay vague until after the election, when she might actually have the power to do something about it. No one on Palestine’s side has anything to gain from her losing votes over it.

        • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s because there is a large, internally-polled segment of the Pennsylvania electorate who are Jewish and sympathetic to Israel.

          Harris can’t afford to not court them.

          I have no doubt she vehemently dislikes Bibi and would wish to cut aid.

          I hope you are right. But, without evidence (if there is any, please share it), this might be wishful thinking. You might just be a more moral person than Harris. I might be being extremely unfair, but it doesn’t seem impossible for an elected official to be willing to sacrifice the lives of innocent people in a country without American voters to gain power.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I think there have been some “leaked” info to reputable journalists how both Biden and Harris pretty much despise Bibi at this point. I think if you look at it in the aggregate in how they pushed for the ceasefire (as opposed to Trump speaking with Bibi to actively undermine it), in her comments after meeting with Bibi shortly after becoming the presumed nominee following Biden stepping down — there is a clear tonal change from, say, 6-months-ago even. So yeah, I think her hands are pretty well tied.

            Either way, the reality any sane person can understand is that there are much better odds we see movement from Harris than we do from Trump.

            • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Either way, the reality any sane person can understand is that there are much better odds we see movement from Harris than we do from Trump.

              I completely agree with that. I admit to being impatient for change now, because innocent people are dying now. It is sad that elections (and electorates) get in the way of such important moral principles.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Gaza is not the only issue? Tell that to the main stream media.

    Current Politics can be summarized into 3 things.

    • Israel
    • The Opponent
    • The Election

    Anything else doesn’t exist in their eyes. My grandfather had his Fubo running last night, I kid you not 10 minutes of ads, and every single one of them was based off one of those 3 categories. I asked him why he’s paying 95$ a month to watch smear campaigns and the same 3 topics over and over.

  • P_P@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Once you are under dictatorship, you can’t vote to hold anyone accountable. Vote for Trump and you won’t have a say in what happens to Gaza. Or anything else.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      yea, but you get to brag to all the other inmates in the political prison yard that you stood up for your principles by not voting!

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They’ll be in the same political prisons as their primary enemies, the classic liberal Dems.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        65
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m not as enthused as you to vote for a system where innocent civilians have to die for political convenience, sorry. My morals say that killing is wrong, and I don’t like it.

        • GiantChickDicks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It doesn’t take enthusiasm to make an active move toward harm reduction if and when you see the opportunity, especially when the consequences are this serious. I would love to see ranked choice voting and a diverse and motivated number of parties to challenge the dichotomy we have now, but I live in the reality of the viable options in front of me in this moment.

          This isn’t about an acceptance or endorsement of the system we have now. Unfortunately for all of us, however, this is the system we currently live in. If my choices are between bad and catastrophic, I’m going with bad. Doubly so in cases like these. The choice is either the people who are suffering may or will continue to do so, versus these same people suffering even worse while making multiple new groups of people suffer, too.

          If Trump wins and things get as bad, or worse, than the scenarios that have been proposed on record, more people will continue to lose their homes, autonomy, and lives in the United States. Many people who are suffering from atrocities actively going on in places other than the Middle East will likely also be worse off under these policies.

          I hope those people who feel as if they own the moral high ground will remember they had an opportunity to stop it and chose to do nothing if we suddenly all find ourselves living in that world.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I hope those people who feel as if they own the moral high ground will remember they had an opportunity to stop it

            How many people died in Gaza today? I wish I had an opportunity to stop that.

            but I live in the reality of the viable options

            Yes, and I am unhappy that the options all involve ‘innocent people are dying right now’. This bothers me.

            If it’s the moral high ground to say that killing is wrong, then it is also the moral high ground for you to say “The choice is either the people who are suffering may or will continue to do so, versus these same people suffering even worse”. You’re saying that hurting innocent people is bad, yes?

            Having to choose to hurt some or more innocent people is not a choice I am enthused about, no matter what the practical reality is. It would be churlish to criticise someone without food for complaining about their practical choice between going hungry and starving, I feel.

            Practical concerns do not replace morality. Someone might have no choice but to abandon their children because they cannot afford them: this does not stop them from being harmed by the moral weight of what, in all practicality, they had to do.

            • GiantChickDicks
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              My underlying point was the nuance of this entire situation, and you provided another obtuse black-and-white response. If you can’t radically accept the world and your life, it’s going to make it awfully hard to see it well enough to make changes.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Thanks, as a person with a trans gender identity, this really helps me to understand that nothing will change, because fear and oppression will be utilised to force people to rationalise harmful actions as inevitable.

              • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Hey, I’m autistic, queer, and an immigrant. You can hate me if you want, plenty of people do.

                My gender identity is trans. I’m also ethnically Ukrainian. Feel free to assume I’m Russian because I’m different to you. That’s what human society does, create ougroups and scapegoat them. I try to avoid doing it, which makes me an enemy of those who do, because I say impossible things like “can we not kill innocent people?” For practical purposes, that will not happen, and asking for it is naive.

                I know that. But, although impractical and naive, that does not stop it from being the morally correct outcome. My autism shows itself in a very strong sense of justice, and I find justice to be more important than practicality.

            • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              as a person with a trans gender identity

              I’m gonna go ahead and stop you right there chief. Transgender people don’t write “transgender” as two words. Big “as a black man” energy here, cishet loser.

              • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                As a non-binary person who is under the trans gender umbrella, without being transgender in the sense of having transitioned across genders, I am careful with my language. I am not transgender in the way people typically understand.

                Feel free to participate in non-binary erasure, I’m used to it. Humans love creating outgroups so they can bully each other, that is why I find myself not labelling myself as human. I think gender is stupid, and I think humans are rude.

        • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m voting so the state doesn’t kill my sister if she has complications in her pregnancy.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That is good. I would also like to be able to vote so the state doesn’t send weapons to enable one country to kill innocent people in another. Some of those people dying are sisters, and their siblings feel much like you might when they are without them.

            • HostilePasta
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              “So do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide.”

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            56
            ·
            7 hours ago

            If your point is “some people think that killing is wrong”, feel free to consider your point proven.

            • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You’re choosing between “lots of people being killed” vs “LOOOOOOTTTTTSSSS of people being killed”

              Based on your own morality you have outlined, ethically you would choose to vote Kamala then, as under her far far fewer people will die.

                • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  No demon at all has created it; other humans have. You aren’t the sole person responsible for responding to it, but your actions will contribute to what happens next, non-action included.

                  You can say that this kind of situation implies someone else has done something wrong, leaving you holding the bag, and you’d be right, if nobody had done something wrong, we wouldn’t have a genocide to talk about in the first place- but saying that leaving you holding the moral bag was a wrong thing to do doesn’t change the fact that you are now holding that bag, along with all the rest of us. And about half of us (referring to the people of the US as a whole), if you haven’t noticed, have every desire of causing even more harm. “Neither” is simply not an option when failing to choose the least bad thing will result in someone else choosing the worse one. It’s not fair, it’s repulsive even, but the universe does not work in such a way as to ensure only fair moral choices exist. Morality is a thing we invented, the world doesn’t care about conforming to it.

                  Getting the best outcome you have with the bad options presented you matters more than whether or not you feel your own personal hands are clean- because metaphorically clean hands will not save the people of Palestine, and likely would doom some, and others elsewhere, that could have been saved. A clean feeling conscience bought by leaving people you could have helped to die is little more than a delusion of innocence.

        • poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Not voting is a choice as well. A choice that will make it so that your voice will not have an impact on whether the candidate that kills more will win, or the candidate that kills less. Choosing to abstain is an announcement that you don’t care about those whose lives are being threatened, the opposite of what you seem to think it is.

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Honestly my ideology on it is the same as my parents and my grandparents, and even my great grandparents ideology.

            I don’t care who you vote for, what you vote for, or your reasoning’s for doing do.

            But if you refuse to vote, regardless of reason, you lose any say in complaining about what happens as a result, as you actively did nothing to help prevent it, meaning you have no right to removed about the outcome.

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            7 hours ago

            A great Canadian philosopher once said “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!”

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            33
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Not voting is a choice as well.

            Yes, but I don’t have any other choice, myself.

            Choosing to abstain is an announcement that you don’t care

            No, it’s an announcement that I care so much about innocent people dying that I am morally conflicted about being asked to be part of a political system which condones it.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I’m acting like someone who is saying that they do not accept killing innocent people as a viable part of a political process that will make the human world better.

        • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          So you’re voting for fascism or just going to sit it out in a political statement? Or being bold and voting third party?

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So you’re voting for fascism or just going to sit it out in a political statement? Or being bold and voting third party?

            I cannot cast a vote in this election.

  • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Gaza is not the only issue” should not be the takeaway here:

    “Even on this issue [Gaza], Donald Trump and his right-wing friends are worse,” Sanders said in the six-minute video, which he posted to X. He noted that Republicans have fought to block humanitarian aid to Gaza and that Trump — who has praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — has suggested Gaza would be a great site for beachfront development.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’d really like to see someone who has the power to actually do something stand up to Israel and knock them down a peg or 2.

    The information that I’ve seen about Israel’s attack on Iran over the weekend has some outrageous levels of discrepancy. Israel claims it crippled all of Iran’s air defenses and its ability to produce drones and missiles. Iran claims it intercepted the attack with limited damage (and a few confirmed fatalities). The truth is almost certainly between these 2 points with tons of propaganda and straight-up misinformation, but despite the “Iran Dome” bravado I’m not convinced that Iran’s defense was particularly successful.

    I am no fan of Iran by any stretch and would prefer a more benign entity to step in and do something, but seeing them keep Israel in check would have been a welcome change. I guess my mindset is that you never really want one group to have too much power over others because being able to act with impunity opens the door for the worst types of behavior.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s a fundamentally uncomfortable position. The people of Gaza matter, and we can be pretty sure that Harris will continue current Biden Admin policies on it. You can’t argue for the hundred other policies at stake without knowingly allowing genocide to happen with US approval.

      But here’s the thing: there are two very prominent Jewish people who don’t believe for a second that both sides are the same. One of them is Bernie Sanders. The other is Benjamin Netanyahu.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s a fundamentally uncomfortable position. The people of Gaza matter

        Thank you for saying this.

        If I were American, I would surely vote for Harris. But I would want to have been able to do more to keep people safe from state terrorism.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve been foolishly arguing with people for months on this topic.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        On my instance, the UI doesn’t even give a downvote option. There’s probably a way around that, though, not that I am interested.

        Getting rid of downvotes is, I think, a good thing.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Hey look, someone finally posted an article about this so the mods don’t remove it!

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Stop pretending Harris also doesn’t have absolutely horrible immigration, environmental and police policies as well.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No politically viable candidate will have environmental policies sufficient to properly address climate change. We are so unbelievably behind the 8-ball on this.

      • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I mean she does she supports police funding, violence against refugees and half arsed environmental policies hell she is pro-fracking for example.

  • Jagothaciv@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yea for real the amount of myopic one issue voices must be that of the privileged or Russian propaganda because WE ALL KNOW that hardworking normal Americans struggle with more than one issue that is 5000 miles away.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      struggle with more than one issue that is 5000 miles away.

      Humans could be killing innocent people in another galaxy. I still don’t approve of killing innocent people. Distance doesn’t matter.

      If you must sacrifice humans elsewhere for the good of your political system, kill me. I accept the sacrifice. I will die in their place. I will give Israel my address. If someone must die, I will do it.

      I just do not enjoy hearing, every day, about children being killed in bombings. It makes me not want to be alive.

  • halyk.the.red
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Gunna vote twice, once for each candidate, so I double my chances of ensuring genocide. It’s what america was founded on, it’s what our forefathers would have wanted.