Ignore the fact that it’s coming from Breitbart. This is really freaky in more than one way.

FTA:

Against stiff competition, the alliance of tech and media giants has devised a plan that may constitute Big Tech’s most brazen power-grab yet.

According to Microsoft’s press release, it has partnered with several other organizations to form the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA).

Put simply, the purpose of this organization is to devise a system whereby all content on the internet can be traced back to its author.

The press release states that it will develop these specifications for “common asset types and formats,” meaning videos, documents, audio, and images.

Whether it’s a meme, an audio remix, or a written article, the goal is to ensure that when content reaches the internet, it will come attached with a set of signals allowing its provenance — meaning authorship — can be detected.

  • Niquarl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 years ago

    Honestly is it not possible to find a single other source than Breitbart? If this is fact important one wouldn’t need to read a Breitbart post.

    • kitsunekunOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Dumb comment is dumb.

      EDIT: please stay on topic, as the rules for this sub encourage it: Try to keep things on topic

        • kitsunekunOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          4 years ago

          Unsure if you are being sarcastic. But the level of idiocy and self-absorbedness required to make that first post complaining about the source rather than what’s reported says a lot about the person: “hey, look, it’s not a source I like, therefore it’s invalid”.

          Typical American narcissism.

            • kitsunekunOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              4 years ago

              Then I invite you to read the text, and you be the judge, mate.

            • kitsunekunOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              4 years ago

              And what happens to the individual that came to my thread with the explicit intention of derailing it without any consideration? Let me guess? Nothing. As others have pointed out, the topic at hand is legitimate, but all the negative attention now is on me and the source. How ridiculous!

              You sure are on your way to become Reddit with this double standard! Keep it up.

              • nutomicA
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 years ago

                There is no double standard. Its simply that insulting other users is against the rules, but there is nothing that forbids criticising sources (which I wouldnt consider derailing).

                • kitsunekunOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 years ago

                  Well, let’s agree to disagree on the “derailing” topic. As for insulting people, I just said his comment was dumb. I don’t see how that’s an insult. Even intelligent people say dumb stuff from time to time, nothing wrong with it, I do say dumb stuff as well.

                  • nutomicA
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    This is not the kind of behaviour we like to see here. If you keep acting like this then you will be banned.

                  • Niquarl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    It was not my intention to derail. To be honest I had no idea there could be such attention on a single thread on lemmy yet ( shows it’s getting more popular!) People aren’t going to take the news seriously if ir’s reported by Breitbart instead of a more respected news outline. This doesn’t mean it has to be a liberal or leftist news outlet instead, just one that doesn’t require to go: “It know it’s Breitbart but hear me out!”

      • Niquarl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 years ago

        Even Wikipedia blocks Breitbart links by default… It’s pretty ridiculous to just say I only want sources that agree with me or whatever. I’m asking any other source, whatever from L’humanité to The New York Times through the Wall Street Journal I don’t care. Anything that has a bit more credence is appreciated.

        Honestly after the slur filter the admin made that I disagreed with, though I completely understand why they did it, maybe it’s time to block certain site (from malicious spam filled shit to even a couple of news media, Breitbart, Daily Mail or Fdesouche seem like a pretty good start IMHO. After all this is floss so one can go share Breitbart on another server.

        • Ratoeira547
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          I agree with you, the Lemmy devs should block BBC web addresses for spreading misinformation about China and the list goes on.