• 1 Post
  • 43 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 5th, 2021

help-circle









  • The problem with this argument is that there aren’t really any sides, and these arguments you’re pointing to as examples aren’t math equations. Two sides can both be wrong at the same time, without it being a point-scoring game. It really doesn’t matter who is worst, most of the time.

    To use your example, “and you’re lynching negroes” is whataboutism, because it’s not a defense of imprisoning dissidents, nor a response to it. It’s just an attempt to avoid having to defend the actions of the side you identify with by pointing out that your opponent’s side has also done indefensible things.

    It’s not that you have to be perfect all the time, but when your side is accused of a crime, the correct response isn’t to deny responsibility and point fingers. At least, I believe the correct response is to A.) Actually defend your actions. Maybe you had good reasons, or maybe the exigencies of the situation required it. OR B.) Admit wrongdoing, promise to do better and actually try to keep that promise.

    Saying “Well, actually I don’t have to address this because racism.” is so incredibly pathetic, and doesn’t really inspire respect. I admit it is a little difficult to argue with people predisposed to think that all communists are evil and wrong, America is the greatest USA, etc. But, to be honest I don’t really think there’s much point in arguing with those people anyway, because it’s not really going to convince them and is generally a waste of time. I do think it’s useful and important to recognize whataboutism, because it’s frequently used by the unscrupulous to shift criticism away from themselves. I think a good example of this in modern politics is Trump using Hunter Biden benefiting from nepotism to distract audiences during debates from his own failings. Instead of addressing those failings, he would throw out accusations that his opponent was also corrupt. This wasn’t untrue, but it also wasn’t relevant and saved him from having to respond to accusations of wrongdoing while allowing him to establish a false equivalency between nepotism and his many, many crimes.




  • drone621toAsklemmyBlatant censorship
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m a little curious what this user was banned for as well. I don’t have any vested interest, but I scrolled through Julianus’ comments and didn’t see anything approaching bad taste. Maybe I missed it, or it was scrubbed.




  • drone621toPoliticsMoral Consistency Is Not Putin Apologia
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    This would be a lot easier to take at face value if I didn’t see so much blatant Putin apologia on lemmy. It’s totally possible to condemn both the US and Russia for being warmongering, bloated empires, but it feels like in a lot of cases criticism of the US is brought up to downplay Putin’s warcrimes. No war but class war.