• k_o_t
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 years ago

    ppl be like

    excuse me, why is this completely new tablet that runs linux designed by small startup in china not price competitive and isn’t as good as this tablet from a company that’s worth trillions of dollars and has been designing tablets for a decade 😡😤

    • AgreeableLandscapeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s like all the tech journals harping on Fairphone for being as expensive as a flagship phone for a midrange performing phone.

      Like, you do realize that the entire goddamn point of the Fairphone is that they don’t engage in cost cutting measures that are unethical or reduce the longevity or sustainability of the product, right?

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      That’s all that matters from the point of view of most consoomers though- is it good and is it worth the price? And for most people, nope, probably not.

      I think most people buying it though are like me, i.e. linux-using nerds willing to spend a bit to get something unique in the market.

      • Bilb!
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        There are definitely some rough spots. They intend to have rotation working soon, but I was surprised by that omission as well.

        • AgreeableLandscapeM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Probably a DE issue with realigning all the windows, icons, or other UI elements. In their defense, Windows tablets are just as inelegant with this as when the first Surface dropped. Hope it’s not an accelometer driver issue though.

    • blackfire
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      i agree, i think the price is way too high but if they can actually get the desktop apps to work then it may be a pretty good cross over machine.

    • AgreeableLandscapeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      That’s the issue with most ARM SOCs. Same problem AFAIK with the Raspberry Pi and Pine64 products. We really need more mainline compatible ARM (or mass market RISC-V) chips.

        • AgreeableLandscapeM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          I stand correct then. I wonder what the problem is with the JingPad in that case. Like, is there some weird hardware or chip that they’re using that only has proprietary drivers? Maybe the rounded tablet style touchscreen? Or are they just not making their own custom hardware drivers open source?

            • AgreeableLandscapeM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Most soc drivers are closed sourced and compiled into the kernel.

              The biggest pitfall of a monolithic kernel is the security implications of these drivers.