I’m talking about deeply held beliefs you have that many might disagree with here or deem to be incompatible with Marxist ideology. I’m interested because I doubt everyone here is an ideological robot who all share the same uniformity in belief

  • Adhriva@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The proles, especially in the West, often don’t want to read dry, jargon-filled theory unless they are already radicalized. Western socialist publications would be better served through allegory, metaphor, and subtext in fiction—ranging from comics, to fan fic, to short stories, short films, indie games, and other mediums of what gets lumped into “entertainment”—than continuing the focus on more articles on why x’s theory is better. Of all the socialist-friendly publishing I’ve ever come across, none of them has ever had a fiction section. NONE. With no plans or interest in one. I think we’re doing ourselves a great disservice and limiting our reach by not producing and giving greater focus to spreading fictional content that doesn’t adhere to capitalist ideology or its underpinning assumptions about the world.

    • whoami@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think you need those things as intros to theory. Start with popular culture, or something relatable, before getting to something deeper

    • comradebanan@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      i agree. most people want to live their life and not think about politics. think about how it is now, basically. We absorb capitalist ‘culture’(or lack of, however we want to think of it) through background noise mostly. We pick up stuff from entertainment and from wherever we do frequent: for a lot of us that’s work, and/or school, and possibly ‘online’.

      we should seek to disseminate our ideas through many channels.

      some people are very theory minded and political and like to study texts and apply it to real life situations. that won’t cease to exist because we try to appeal to people in less explicit ways. in my opinion, it will likely increase the amount of studious and politically involved workers just by increasing the amount of people who are being exposed to communist ideas.

      For me it was hearing figures like Tupac or Helen Keller were communist, or pro communist, that made me interested in the first place. I looked into them as figures, then into communism in general.

  • TripleZ
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    My views regarding prostitution is probably one most people on the left won’t agree with. I do consider sex workers as workers, however, rather than working towards legalising prostitution, we should work towards eliminating the circumstances that force people to turn to prostitution in order to feed themselves. Ideologically, I’m not comfortable with the implications that it commodifies the human body and turns it into nothing more than a tool to be used by others. This is the very view that slave owners had, turning humans into nothing more than property to be used.

    Arguably, it’s the same view that Marx has of prostitution, but somehow it’s not popular in Leftist circles.

  • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Around most left wing circles around here my controversial opinion would be that they are too elitist and ‘soft’ so to say. Dutch left wing figureheads are mostly elitist figures whose life goal it is to do politics. They look like cartoon figures to me and I really think it’s one of the reasons they don’t have success.

    I know that’s bordering body shaming, but I can’t help but think that way. I don’t mean that you have to look like a body building factory worker as a left wing leader, but still. In Belgium, for example, a lot of our members of parliament are actual factory workers / cleaning staff etc. and I can just see the difference it makes. They know what workers are up to, they use the same language, they might even look the same. Dutch left wing politics is focussed too much on the people that had higher education so that they can pretend to be better than the actual workers, workers for which they seem to be allergic to.

    This might not be controversial here, but I got a lot of shit for expressing my views like this lol

    • sudojonz@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a buitenlander in NL (here for almost 11 years now), I totally agree on that view. The outward facing "left"involved in the political process here are almost entirely bourgeois champagne socialists who seemingly never had a hard day in their lives and are incapable of connecting to the common person, “soft” is a great way to describe them. At the same time, most of the “hard” on-the-ground leftists I’ve met in Amsterdam seem too close in their views to co-opted CIAnarchists instead of Marxist-Leninist socialists and communists, and that bums me out hardcore. My working theory on that is because they take their cues on social issues from the American “left” instead of through their own dialectical processes and historical nature of the struggles. Their ideas are tainted with Amero-centric characteristics.

      There is a big hole in NL politics where a legitimate Socialist Party of workers should be. SP (the official socialist party of Netherlands) are at best a bunch of weak-willed SocDems a la Bernie Sanders. Might as well be controlled-opposition. It’s time to bring back the tomatoes (and throwing) from which the SP logo is designed.

      • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The funny thing about SP is that they realized the same thing, but instead of trying to educate the workers on the importance of socialism, they are now considering taking on reactionary takes to appeal to them. Literally the reverse way of thinking.

        • sudojonz@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah you nailed it exactly. It’s really muddying the waters of socialism as mainstream Dutch understand it, simultaneously as it pushes the Overton Window to the right.

    • comradebanan@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      individualism fetishizes losing. they have a million reasons why they can’t do anything and why nothing is good enough for them to contribute to.

  • Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I firmly believe that you guys raise many good points but I’m a black man in America so I still have a few homegrown beliefs that I can’t shake. I think belief in God or a god is unfairly discriminated against in leftist circles. Fascists aren’t evil because they have faith, their evil because they use faith as a shield and spear to attack others.

    • Black AOC@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      You’ve nailed how I feel about it. Like, I don’t have a problem with a religious person; what I have a problem with is the organized ‘religious’ using their religions as a cudgel.

      • ihaveibs@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah religion doesn’t have to be like our modern Abrahamic religions in the west. Everyone has some sort of ‘religion’ anyway that helps us understand the world, why not share it with our community? It’s only a problem when it crosses into orthodoxy

    • JoYo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      isn’t that like one of the ten commandments? using god to promote fascism sure seems like taking their name in vain.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Judging from the lack of any noticeable reaction, he’s definitely not angry. Considering the multiple times he punished Israelites for way less, and taking pardon me for saying that, holocaust into consideration, god is a fascist himself.

        Or he, idk, just don’t exist

    • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I believe revolution in the imperial core will only become possible once the conditions deteriorate to a sufficient level that most people no longer benefit from a continuation of the status quo. This will happen when they have lost enough of their imperial control over the rest of the world that they can no longer afford to maintain their material conditions to an acceptable level for existence for the majority of people, which requires that they lose the ability to freely steal the resources and exploit the labor of the global south, that they lose the ability to extract superprofits from underdeveloped countries through neo-colonial unequal exchange, and finally that their financial monopolies are pushed out and they are no longer able to coast by on the “free lunch” of monopoly rents.

      This is why the rapid and real development that is being achieved through mechanisms like the Belt and Road Initiative and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (which represents a positive alternative to the predatory IMF), and multilateral organizations like the BRICS pose an existential threat to the imperial core’s global hegemony, without which their relative prosperity would be unsustainable.

      That is why anti-imperialism must be the first and foremost priority for revolutionaries in the imperial core, since no revolution can occur as long as imperialism has not been defeated.

    • Black AOC@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wholly agreed tbh. There may be sparse unfortunates who can get on the same, proper accord, but they’re too few, too far between, and too either disorganized, or organized on an archaic “class only” line that takes no modern assessment of the imperial core’s material conditions.

    • Lemmy_Mouse@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Perhaps yes perhaps not; I will say this has never been done before, but what else are we in the core to do even if this is the case?

  • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think the USSR went too far with pretending certain events never happened, which makes those events seem more significant than they were. Example: When they edited out Trotsky from pictures, it was completely unnecessary, it’s easy to explain Trotsky’s faults and whitewashing history by acting like he wasn’t an instrumental part of the Revolution is a band-aid solution to the problem of revisionism and reformism.

  • Black AOC@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    My 3.6 roentgen take is that frankly, if you live in the imperial core, and your Socialism/Marxism/pick-another-left-ism isn’t explicitly anti-colonial and reparative, your ‘leftism’ is just as hollow as the ‘progressive’ libs; and it shouldn’t come as a surprise to you when the subjects-of-empire that are getting whittled away start considering the only proper way forward to be lit by the fire of a burning Amerikan flag.

  • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If I’m in a Patsoc space then it would be that a revolution in the United States will have to be an anti-colonial movement led by black and indigenous people, and that there will be no “USSA”

  • Lemmy_Mouse@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    The COVID virus was most likely a bioweapon created by the US to release on either Russia or China as evidenced by the Ukrainian biolabs.

    9/11 was likely committed by the CIA and Saudi Arabia and I think the Patriot Act was likely their motivation/aim.

    There is already evidence that suggests the FBI create terrorists/mass shooters, however I believe 98% of these events are due to the actions of the FBI.

    I say likely because I am not an expert on these subjects, these are simply my opinions currently on these matters.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      9/11 was likely committed by the CIA and Saudi Arabia and I think the Patriot Act was likely their motivation/aim.

      I don’t think there is any other option. From the attackers persons, through pentagon attack, the destruction of buildings up to complete lack of any other noticeable attack in America, everything just screams “FALSE FUCKING FLAG”. Not to mention what happened later, the worst decades of naked imperialism ever.

    • Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      At this point, I prefer to believe that COVID was completely natural. Playing who’s who with bioweapons is a rabbit hole I don’t want to go down.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah I prefer the same, but I always question Fort Detrick labs and the whole Virginia and Maryland thing with oldage home deaths, plus the coincidence of mysterious pneumonia-like vaping illness, 3 months after which we saw COVID. Even French government told their Olympic athletes to keep mouth shut in front of press.

        • Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh yeah no, there is overwhelming evidence that COVID or at least something similiar didn’t start in China but it’s all been scrubbed now.

    • JK1348@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      They fuckin did it! Maybe they didn’t directly create COVID, but the capitalist conditions created it and it was just convenient for the CIA to let the working class die of it

    • Comrade_J@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think this too.

      My evidence is that in August 2019 the US completed a clinical trial for a MERS vaccine that provides the technological breakthrough that allowed all the top tier Covid vaccines to work. Also, there’s the thing where US intelligence agencies warned Israeli intelligence agencies about an outbreak in China, before China knew or could know there was an outbreak.

      The coincidence of the US just having developed a vaccine that took nearly a decade to get a breakthrough and then the outbreak in China happening a couple of months later is just too perfect. Had they waited longer, China would have preemptively started developing a vaccine based off that research. US intelligence agencies probably misjudged just how long it would take to ramp up production of the vaccine, likely mislead by industry insiders excited to gobble up billions of dollars.

      I also don’t know why no one is talking about the MERS vaccine and how US pharma pretended to discover effective vaccines at “Warp Speed.”

  • xenautika@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    the heavy emphasis on online spaces and culture is a bourgeois distraction that alienates the working class more than it unifies

    • HaSch@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      There’s no way around touching grass and organising, teaching, or debating offline, but we should not simply choose to forego an online presence in the name of combatting this alienation because that would mean to hand this arena of class warfare over to the enemy without a fight. There is just no cheaper or more convenient method to store, find, connect, evaluate, organise, and distribute information than the internet, lots of people do spend most of their leisure online, and it is easier for the children of a speed-addicted age to learn theory by watching short videos than it is to read it in a book. Neglecting this sphere of life means standing by as the capitalists use it to spread fascism

  • ihaveibs@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Our internalized liberalism (Westernism?) means that all socialist groups in the West inevitably become about being The Good Ones who know better than everyone else and is a fundamental reason why there will never be a successful revolution in the current world order. ML spaces like this one included.

      • frippa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        I believe there’s also a Midwestern Marx book coming out on it too.

        The purity fetish and the crisis of western Marxism I believe it’s the title, I’ll buy it when it comes out this week

      • Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        If Christianity blunts revolutionary consciousness, why did Cuba, a majority Catholic country pre-Castro, make a revolution?

        • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The argument doesn’t apply to Cuba. They didn’t have an established Marxist tradition when the revolution happened to have to debate each other’s purity of socialism. Another aspect is that the revolution wasn’t communist originally, they just want sovereignty and they found that in socialism after the revolution. Once the whole country was governed by democratic centralism there were no factions to debate how to have the purest seizure of power.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Because the contradictions risen so much that people just stopped paying attention to the usual “ora et labora”. It’s was also far from the only revolution in christian country but all of them, successful or not, went despite the churches.

        • JK1348@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because then there’s a sociology and cultural aspect that isn’t being applied during the period of 60s to 70s the Roman Catholic Church in Latin America started to have Archbishops that preached liberation theology which in turn laid some foundations for a Marxist gateway if you will, of people starting to lean really left. This is apparent in El Salvador and Nicaragua FMLN and FSLN

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      This space is about education, not necessarily itself being a revolution. And there are not just North Americans here. Awareness and presenting a discussion space in itself is critical because the controlled internet is not exactly very welcoming of communists. This “space” migrated from Reddit. You need numbers and educated notions for revolution.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Depend what socialist circles.

    Among infantile disorders and opportunists is that i support Russia in the Ukraine war (critically of course, but opportunists and ID don’t get that term in the first place).

    Among ML’s is that atheism is an integral part of materialism and thus marxism (shouldn’t be any controversial since its obvious but still it cause shitstorm every time it surfaces)

    Also a weird one since most of people will agree with effects but i was already banned in some places for saying that - patriotism have class characteristics and is not a term to be screamed upon and exorcised just because some US youtube shitheads try to apropriate it.

  • dinomug
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Putin has done more for socialism, anti-imperialism and internationalism than all the parties/organizations in the collective west (NATO and vassals) that claim to be progressive/socialist/leftist/communist/etc.

      • Navaryn@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        very simply, by challenging american hegemony. That doesn’t make him a good person or a leftist, but Russia is the reason why the global south feels like you can ignore the US’s wishes and get away with it.

        To make a few examples, Putin (with comrades Xi and Lula) is spearheading the process of de-dollarization of the global economy, which will benefit all of us massively, and he is also the first to draw a line concerning NATO expansion. Moreover, he is an oligarch - but he also prevented Russia from being fully and completely looted by neoliberalism. Russia still has control of its resources, how many countries victim of neoliberalism can say the same?

        Putin has showed the world that you CAN fight NATO, and that most of the world will either be on your side or at least indifferent

      • darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        In addition to what others said broadly. The moves he is making and allowing others to make if successful will cripple the US to the point where it eventually lead to barbarism or revolution, there will be no other choices and no options to continue the status quo as imperialist plunder will stop and the bourgeoisie will start devouring the labor aristocracy at home for profits out of desperation.

        He isn’t doing it for those reasons but if you only care about purity of intent you’ll get nowhere in this messy world of ours as it stands. Its results we must care about, it is the material change and reality, not the best wishes and idealism which will bring about communism.

        So in that respect, if this whole thing pans out and the US doesn’t pull out some masterful trump card, he will have had a large hand in helping the peoples of the world by no intentions of his own. Much like the German government helped communism by sending Lenin back on a train, it was not their intent for all that happened with the Soviet Union to follow but it was the actual material consequence of their actions.

      • Yang Wen-li@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        How accurate is that? I keep hearing it, but from what I’ve read Gennady is just another passive general secretary. He’s not terribly unique from the old guard, but he’s not Gorbachev either. Just a classic communist with some religious views.

  • Femboy_Apotheosis@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That the average American’s brain is so perfectly engineered through centuries of capitalist conditioning and selective breeding as to make socialism impossible for the mean white person in the US.

    They’d rather bathe in blood than live a normal, happy life. They legitimately seem inhuman.

    • aidnic@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, Americans are very conditioned by the capitalist propaganda being fed to them since forever but “selective breeding”? What do you mean by that?

      • Femboy_Apotheosis@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        That through artificial selective pressures such as starvation, extreme poverty, suicide and prison, the US Bourgeois have managed to breed a subservient people through unintentional eugenics.

        • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          Can you explain the eugenics aspect, I don’t wanna come off as dismissive or anything, I wanna hear you out, but race-mixing isn’t really looked down upon in the US

          • Femboy_Apotheosis@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I mean, I was born in 96. My mom is white, and her parents were deeply uncomfortable for several years after I was born. I’d argue that in large parts of the country, race-mixing is still a touchy subject in the 40-and-up crowd.

            I’m not sure what’s unclear or needs elaborating insofar as the eugenics aspect. The Amweican Bourgeois punish dissidents to the point of being unable to raise children, or to suicide. Repeat this over several generations, while constantly redefining what ‘mentally stable’ is to center the least Dissident, most violent members of society, and you’ve essentially bred a population of sociopathic ant-men.

            Edit_1: If you have a better explanation I’m all ears, but I’m not aware of any large population of human beings that, if given the choice, would rather murder minorities both sexual and ethnic, as opposed to eat. They just don’t seem human.

            • xenautika@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              what’s happening right now is a good example… black kids being shot for getting the wrong address and ringing the doorbell. black kids forced to make ends meet, such as walking long distances or finding income and frequently subjected to violence. this isn’t happening to white kids, especially those of the ruling class, a class distinguished through whiteness. these children who are successfully being raised in secure, gated christo-fascist neighborhoods, have parents or escorts with them all the time. politicians are totally apathetic to violence on children because they know their (white) children will never face dangers like school shootings, having bourgeois privileges and security. billboards everywhere for new elite housing developments featuring white blonde haired families while people die on the streets… white supremacy has never diminished despite the reformist gains that attempt to reduce it.

              • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                2 years ago

                I wouldn’t say that white kids aren’t threatened by mass shootings because they are most often the perpetrators and school shootings often happen at schools where the kid went previously (or are going).

    • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a cracker born, raised, and living among the crackers I can confirm with first hand experience. I’m starting to think the lemmygrad user who had the idea of trapping all whites in Europe and surrounding the borders with auto turrets might be on to something.

    • ihaveibs@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      This feels too biologically reductionist to me. More like they perfected the social engineering necessary for their empire to operate

      • Femboy_Apotheosis@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Call me a dumb lib, but I agree with Chomsky when he was debating the post-modernists.

        There are natural bounds to how you can manipulate human behavior; you can’t reshape the fundamental human psych more than you can the eye, you just have to work with what you’re given.

        Americans don’t act like humans. They don’t love their children; they’re an extension of the parent’s narcissistic ego. They don’t even crave comfort or food; they’d rather see other people actively suffer than improve their lives. I’ve NEVER heard of any other population so in love with death and sadistic violence. It’s I’m every part of their culture, and it seems distinct from the basic functionality of mirror neurons in, what I’d call, normal humans.

        • ihaveibs@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          This is ridiculous and easily disproven by just seeing recent immigrants acting the same way. Human beings are 100% naturally capable of behaving the way Americans do, it’s the system we live in that systematically engineers this behavior that is the problem.

          • Femboy_Apotheosis@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Tell you what, if I ever see America not act like a hive of subhuman serial killers I’ll concede the point, k?

            If the country can go two weeks straight without celebrating dead minorities over my lifetime, I won’t think your all natural poor baby eaters.

            It’s a very high bar for Americans, though. They love to bathe in corpses.

            • ihaveibs@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              Look, I am not against wiping America off the face of the earth if necessary to preserve the rest of the world. It will take untold centuries of cultural revolution to undo the rot of settler society. But frankly, I don’t see how the idea that Americans act the way they do because of genetics and selective breeding is compatible with the Marxist worldview.

      • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Gotta agree, it’s crazy how much social factors influence us that there doesn’t need to be any genetic differences to make much of the American population messed up.