deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Would you define blocking access to vaccines as philanthropy? It does seem like a genius PR move though, making people think he has reformed and is helping poor people out, when in truth, it’s all just self-serving capitalism.
Taxes exist to give value to money. Basically, when a government prints money, that piece of paper has no inherent value. You can conduct your business in seashells if you so decide.
However, at the end of the year, you’re going to want to convert your seashells into your government’s currency in order to pay your taxes. And that is what gives the currency value. The amount that is taxed depends on how much liquidity there is in the economy. If there’s too much money around, higher taxes would reduce that.
This is a fairly poor explanation of how it is, you could read “Macroeconomics” by Mitchell, Watts and Wray for a more in-depth explanation including historical examples using “sticks” for taxes.
Why stop at base 12. Let’s go base-60. Divisible by 2,3,4,5 and 6.
My views regarding prostitution is probably one most people on the left won’t agree with. I do consider sex workers as workers, however, rather than working towards legalising prostitution, we should work towards eliminating the circumstances that force people to turn to prostitution in order to feed themselves. Ideologically, I’m not comfortable with the implications that it commodifies the human body and turns it into nothing more than a tool to be used by others. This is the very view that slave owners had, turning humans into nothing more than property to be used.
Arguably, it’s the same view that Marx has of prostitution, but somehow it’s not popular in Leftist circles.
So, how many delegates did she get then?