Also known as computer

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
67d

I think they’d love to outlaw general purpose computing. We can already see a preview of what that looks like with how mobile devices work. You don’t have root privileges on the device, and it’s explicitly locked from you. You are only allowed to install software from the official sources, and this software can be wiped remotely from your device if its deemed inappropriate. This is the future of computing that’s being envisioned. The computer just becomes another appliance as opposed to a general purpose computing machine that you yourself can program.

MariusB
link
fedilink
26d

@yogthos @ThreeHopsAhead as long as you stick to windows or linux on your computer and degoogled android on your phone that won’t be possible.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
46d

The part I’m worried about is how long it’s going to be possible to buy hardware that’s not locked down. It’s almost impossible to buy a phone that doesn’t need to be hacked to get root nowadays.

MariusB
link
fedilink
16d

@yogthos I think we will always have that option. Probably you will only not be able to go for the high end devices while seeking full access to your own device, your own property.

PS: No wonder why Linux phones are getting a lot of momentum lately.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
16d

I certainly hope so.

As worded, this would apply to every Turing-complete system that exists, right? Or is it meant to target specific pieces of software - like GPG and Signal and Protonmail and TOR - where the governments don’t have a backdoor?

MariusB
link
fedilink
610d

@yogthos if my digital devices, whether online or offline, cannot be encrypted anymore, then I have no use for them. I will get rid of them and won’t buy the next models anymore.

@onlooker
link
fedilink
610d

Well, how delightfully vague. A “sophisticated, encrypted communication device” could be just about anything that connects to the internet.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
510d

That’s how totalitarian regimes operate, they create vague laws that can then be applied to prosecute whomever is deemed to be a threat to the regime.

link
fedilink
810d

@yogthos Horrific. UK government can’t possibly figure out legitimate uses of encryption (except when they use it of course)

@frippa
link
fedilink
510d

Bye bye crypto wallets

No cryptobros at least!

Privacy
!privacy
Create a post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

  • 0 users online
  • 1 user / day
  • 11 users / week
  • 96 users / month
  • 303 users / 6 months
  • 5.56K subscribers
  • 2.11K Posts
  • 8.09K Comments
  • Modlog