Alternatives Nekogram X an alternative telegram foss client

  • riccardo
    link
    5
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    The next Telegram update not being available in the PlayStore yet has nothing to do with the app listing that permission in its manifest. I’m not entirely sure about what this article is trying to imply though: is it trying to say that Telegram has decided to leave that runtime permission there so Google will purge third-party forks from the PlayStore? Is it implying that Telegram’s trying to push Google to remove their app from the store so they can blame it and use it as a marketing selling point? Is it simply blaming Telegram for not complying with Google’s best practices, eventually leading to some controversies with Google? Telegram for Android’s codebase is well known to be a mess developed by a couple of people who apparently are the only ones who can properly navigate that giant amount of code, I’m not surprised at all that there’s leftovers of storage APIs meant to be used on old android versions. That’s what happens when you self-impose yourself monthly deadlines for major updates. So, to me, this looks like an example of a developer improperly adapting their app to the relatively new scoped storage system. Which is a good reason to be pissed off at Telegram as a fork maintainer, but it has nothing to do with privacy. All other implications sound like conspiracies

    • Santiago🏪
      link
      53 years ago

      I’m agree with you. The real reason is undercovered but it’s easy to perceive some kind of tension between Google and Telegram. I saw some discussion in the NekoX update chat group where some people said it was a privacy thing, claming for e2ee and things like that, but with e2ee it would be de-optimization of the telegram cloud and device sync. So i don’t know, i still consider telegram private, and if you are really into digital neutrality you should know there is a difference between privacy and anonymity. They said things like: telegram is crap and wants to fuck us because it hasn’t have options to log in without a phone number, but it would be certainly impractical.

  • @TheAnonymouseJokerM
    link
    43 years ago

    Good they are going away from Google and the Western global surveillance hegemony.

      • @TheAnonymouseJokerM
        link
        23 years ago

        I am afraid that would be hard from a realistic POV, because Telegram operates very discreetly, does not give in to subpoenas or data requests (outside of Russian intelligence for counter terrorism) and has housed all kinds of people of all controversies, from Hong Kong rioters, to neo nazis, to race supremacists, to pornography, to content piracy, to bestiality movie distribution and so on.

        Telegram is one of the most “free speech” kind of platforms that continues to NOT become a Gab or Parler, due to its moderation controls and privacy/anonymity scope for groups and individuals.

        This is not to promote the messenger, but it is truly a unique platform in this day and age, that continues to be as acceptable as Twitter or YouTube in mainstream, and widely adopted in underground circles.

        There is a common problem with federation, which even Matrix has observed, that is a central server being more reliable even if it presents the problem of single point of failure. I am no Moxie, or against federation at all, but it is what it is.

        What thoughts would you have about this and the app in general?

          • @TheAnonymouseJokerM
            link
            -13 years ago

            There seem to be some elements that just seem uncontrollable as far as adoption goes. WhatsApp is a non standardised XMPP, and initially before the Facebook buyout, it was independent and had a colossal userbase.

            Matrix and XMPP fans are often at crossroads with each other. Then there is Telegram and Discord, both similar and very different than other types of platforms. Then you have stuff like Twitter and Instagram.

            While ethic and merit should come first, there are some exceptions in terms of adoption that truly make you think what goes into success. Polished clients? E2EE? Country of origin? Server reliability? Features? Marketing? The answer is definitely NOT all of the above.

            XMPP is extremely light, solid, stable, federated, easily can be tunneled, but lacks polished clients and marketing. Conversations, Psi, Gajim and Dino are the only decent clients, and out of them Conversations (and its forks) are the only ones that will convince an ordinary user to use it reliably. Then you have to pick a server for account creation, for which there is no central list and none of which is standardised as regards with MAM.

              • @TheAnonymouseJokerM
                link
                -13 years ago

                And that in itself is a problem. People do want features, even if it is non essential to you or me. Our perceptions are irrelevant.

                I use XMPP daily heavily, and find it great, but I happen to also be technologically advanced, so can navigate my way through any issues.

                What you are thinking of as a minimalist approach sounds good on paper, but does not look appealing to the generic end users. Unfortunate.

    • @j0taOP
      link
      13 years ago

      it’s working