For most people distro hopping is like changing car when a light breaks. You are denying yourself the opportunity to learn how to solve a problem. I’ll stick with Debian.
Edit: if you want to learn about different package managers you can just use VMs for that. There’s no need to distro-hop.
Hard disagree. I don’t change distros because something stopped working, especially if it’s something fixable. It is to experiment different distributions and their fundamental differences.
Same here! I use fedora at home (my first Linux distro) and arch on my smaller laptop. I am happy with both…but occasionally i like to test if the “grass is greener” elsewhere. I always come back to my original choices.
deleted by creator
You are denying yourself the opportunity to learn how to solve a problem.
I will argue most people distro hop because they got bored and wanted to explore something new or different. They already learned, that’s the trigger (or problem).
deleted by creator
just to get KDE/GNOME packaged in a certain way or one with a slightly more automated installer.
I agree that type of distro hopping is useless. But experimenting Debian, Arch, Gentoo, NixOS, Slackware, Void, those are all very fundamentally different.
deleted by creator
Maintaining a distro is a huge task
As someone who packaged software for a living for almost three years, I cannot agree more. Even though it was just some packages for something like 10 different distros, not a full maintainership for a distro!
say, why did you change the theme of your blog ?
deleted by creator
Yeah I definitely did it as a learner, but years go by and eventually you get old and lazy. You find something that works perfectly, and then you think, “Should I just let this thing keep working perfectly, or should I stop everything in my life so I can break my OS and spend hours/days/weeks/months/years fixing it?”
I haven’t changed distros in a long, long time. ^_^