You can see it on the sidebar on the main page.

Let us know what you think about them.

  • aev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 years ago

    I like these rules. Maybe add something about adhering to applicable law.

    In my experience(*): the stricter the rules, the easier it becomes for trolls to skirt them, the more admin time is abused. These rules look fine for now.

    (*) I have been an admin of a fairly large online community and survived more than a handful of troll invasions.

    • AgreeableLandscape
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 years ago

      Why not just add a clause that “admins can remove any content they see fit without warning” as a catch-all for any loopholes that pop up?

  • AgreeableLandscape
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 years ago

    I think site wide rules should go in its own separate page with a link to it in the header and/or footer. That way we can expand on the rules and generally add more details about this instance’s content policies without taking up too much space in the front page.

    • nutomicOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 years ago

      Right, wanted to change that to “no porn”. Fixed.

      • AgreeableLandscape
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        What would count as porn in this context? Technically porn would include not just sexual activity but anything primarily meant to cause arousal in at least some people.

        I am be happy with a broad definition of porn (as in anything meant to be sexual) being banned honestly.

        • nutomicOPMA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 years ago

          Yeah its a bit tricky and we will probably have to see on a case by case basis. My opinion is that non-sexual nudity is fine (we dont want to end up like Facebook and ban nipples or some bullshit like that).

          • AgreeableLandscape
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            Just to be clear, Lemmy’s definition of porn includes non-image sexual content right? I definitely think those should not be allowed either and many jurisdictions treat it as porn all the same.

            • nutomicOPMA
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 years ago

              Not sure, its something thats worth discussing. For me its not about legality, but mainly that I dont want to moderate that kind of stuff. I wouldnt consider simple nudity or erotic text as pornography so those would be fine by me.

              • AgreeableLandscape
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                At least ban the really gross stuff like sexualization of minors or other types of sexual exploitation/abuse.

                • nutomicOPMA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Of course, but that’s also clearly covered under porn.

  • AgreeableLandscape
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    I think it’s a good start, but doesn’t cover all the harmful content. You should also add “no harassment of other users”, “no pedophilia”, “no stalking or doxxing” and “no advocating serious crime” just to name a few.

    • nutomicOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 years ago

      We were trying to keep it short, and not list every single bad thing because nobody is going to read that. The things you mentioned are definitely not allowed, and are probably covered by “be respectful”.

      • AgreeableLandscape
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 years ago

        I still really think we should put detailed rules on a dedicated page and just link it in the sidebar and footer. That way users know exactly what’s expected of them.

    • nutomicOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 years ago

      Actually we have a code of conduct in the git repository, maybe we should just put a link to that in the rules.

      /u/dessalines

  • Tommstein
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 years ago

    Well that didn’t take long, for the rules to become even more restrictive than the bastion of free speech that is Reddit. Should help adoption of the fledgling platform skyrocket.

      • Tommstein
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 years ago

        I had just about finished writing a reply, when it spontaneously disappeared, and I’m not writing it again. Oh well.

    • nutomicOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 years ago

      If you want freeze peach you can go somewhere else.

      • Tommstein
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 years ago

        No shit. So will the rest of the Internet except the four softy fascists who need an even safer space than Reddit.

        • AgreeableLandscape
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 years ago

          The rules are “no bigotry”, “be respectful”, “no porn” and “no advertising”. If you can’t even follow those basic rules then no one on Lemmy actually wants you here.

          • Tommstein
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            5 years ago

            Which is fortuitous, because no one outside of the aforementioned four softy fascists is going to want to be here on Lamer Reddit either.

              • Tommstein
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                5 years ago

                Yep, that’s exactly what I said. Also, that’s not what the term “safe space” means, but I appreciate the cute “nuh uh, you are.” A for effort or something.

    • DessalinesMA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 years ago

      The freeze peach havens, voat and gab already exist, you can go to them if you like.

      • Tommstein
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 years ago

        Thanks for the info. And if I needed a safe space to protect my fragile little mind, I could go back to Reddit, at least they actually have users.