You can see it on the sidebar on the main page.

Let us know what you think about them.

  • @nutomicOPMA
    link
    74 years ago

    Yeah its a bit tricky and we will probably have to see on a case by case basis. My opinion is that non-sexual nudity is fine (we dont want to end up like Facebook and ban nipples or some bullshit like that).

    • @AgreeableLandscape
      link
      2
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Just to be clear, Lemmy’s definition of porn includes non-image sexual content right? I definitely think those should not be allowed either and many jurisdictions treat it as porn all the same.

      • @nutomicOPMA
        link
        24 years ago

        Not sure, its something thats worth discussing. For me its not about legality, but mainly that I dont want to moderate that kind of stuff. I wouldnt consider simple nudity or erotic text as pornography so those would be fine by me.

        • @AgreeableLandscape
          link
          4
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          At least ban the really gross stuff like sexualization of minors or other types of sexual exploitation/abuse.

          • @nutomicOPMA
            link
            24 years ago

            Of course, but that’s also clearly covered under porn.

            • @AgreeableLandscape
              link
              3
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              Those content can exist in forms other than images just to be clear, and all forms of them should be banned.