You can see it on the sidebar on the main page.

Let us know what you think about them.

  • nutomicOPMA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 years ago

    Right, wanted to change that to “no porn”. Fixed.

    • AgreeableLandscape
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      What would count as porn in this context? Technically porn would include not just sexual activity but anything primarily meant to cause arousal in at least some people.

      I am be happy with a broad definition of porn (as in anything meant to be sexual) being banned honestly.

      • nutomicOPMA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 years ago

        Yeah its a bit tricky and we will probably have to see on a case by case basis. My opinion is that non-sexual nudity is fine (we dont want to end up like Facebook and ban nipples or some bullshit like that).

        • AgreeableLandscape
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Just to be clear, Lemmy’s definition of porn includes non-image sexual content right? I definitely think those should not be allowed either and many jurisdictions treat it as porn all the same.

          • nutomicOPMA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            Not sure, its something thats worth discussing. For me its not about legality, but mainly that I dont want to moderate that kind of stuff. I wouldnt consider simple nudity or erotic text as pornography so those would be fine by me.