Petition Summary: The petitioner calls for the European Union to actively develop and implement a Linux-based operating system, termed ‘EU-Linux’, across public administrations in all EU Member States. This initiative aims to reduce dependency on Microsoft products, ensuring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and promoting transparency, sustainability, and digital sovereignty within the EU. The petitioner emphasizes the importance of using open-source alternatives to Microsoft 365, such as LibreOffice and Nextcloud, and suggests the adoption of the E/OS mobile operating system for government devices. The petitioner also highlights the potential for job creation in the IT sector through this initiative.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    Focus instead on enforcing standards’ compliance so i can open a .docx with any program and be usable anywhere.

    Then focus on enforcing FOSS software in public services but don’t bother with a “european linux distro”, that’s just a waste of resources. There are already a great deal of distros around. Considering geopolitics i’d go with SuSe or some other EU-based distro.

    • ShortN0te
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Focus instead on enforcing standards’ compliance so i can open a .docx with any program and be usable anywhere.

      That’s an impossible task. Not even Microsoft manages that. Do not want to count how often i used libreOffice to repair or convert an older MSOffice file so it can be opend with modern Versions of MSOffice.

      Once there was a 500MB Excel Sheet with lime 500-1000 used Cells, opened and saved it to.a xlsx file using libreOffice and reduced it to a few MB while still being fully functional.

      • ⁂ jnk :InfinityVerified:@masto.es
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        @ShortN0te @0x0 I mean the real problem here is that MS office is a mess but somehow still standardized, so “enforcing standards” would be as easy as showing MS the middle finger and using libre office. They’d save a lot of money and time, it’s a clear win-win scenario imho

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Focus instead on enforcing standards’ compliance

      For sure, but ¿por qué no los dos?

      Completely agree with your other prioritisations.

  • Papamousse@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    Just use Debian, it has old root, stable, still being developed, it’s the base of various others distro that “enhance” it (sometimes badly).

    Debian.

    I’m using MX Linus AHS, based on Debian, BTW.

  • N0x0n
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As long as the EU doesn’t reinvent the wheel, why not? I mean if they are going to fork Linux and rewrite a EU-based linux OS, this would further divide the community and make issues and security a lot more wacky… Not sure this is a good idea.

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Pretty sure they’re talking about making a distro, not forking the Linux kernel. I don’t see any reason why they would need to fork it anyway.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is dumb. Hand over development to bureaucrats? create a set of guidelines and requirements, and allow distros to be certified, and fund development of distros that are being used.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It would make so much more sense to fund existing Linux development than making a new distro, tbh.

      If the EU changed to Linux systems and donated the same amount back to open source development as they currently pay for Microsoft licenses, that would make a hell of a difference.

  • Stephane L Rolland-Brabant ⁂⧖⏚@mathstodon.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    @JRepin

    just an idea, it could be based on #NixOS , if I remember well the project was partially funded by European Research or Opensource funds.

    Please correct me if I am wrong on the fundings, I say this from distant memory.

    EDIT: it was just an idea, as it is not the most user-friendly distro out there…

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Or they could use a distro that’s already been created by a European vendor, maybe even create a competitive tender. There’s no point in creating a new distro, add a new repository if you must.

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If only the GAFAMS could stop getting money from taxpayers! It would be a big start and then it would just be the individuals who would decide to support by buying their products or not.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      I work in a public administration. And 90% of our work is done on webapps anyway. There will be no difference if the os is windows or linux.

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Honestly, in a managed environment, there’s not really much learning to do. All the hard part of learning Linux is dealing with system issues, or when shit breaks. In corporate land, you’ve got IT staff for that.

      The biggest hurdle would be learning libre office, but considering the average white collar level of mastery of MS office is pretty poor, the basics really aren’t that different in LO.

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Exactly, for the pencil pushers it’s going to be a transition from one desktop and office suite to another. Hardly “learning Linux”.

        I see more of a challenge on sys admins and department IT support who may have gotten comfy giving mostly Microsoft product support.

  • GolfNovemberUniform
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ain’t no way that’s getting accepted. It’s like asking to completely destroy and rebuild one of the EU countries.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They’re already putting out a petition so they’re not wholly against the idea of an EU-Linux.

      Also, this has been done before by other governments, like parts of the UK’s and many Indian governments.

      I think it’d be a big step, but a doable one and for the better.

      Why do you compare it to destroying and rebuilding one of the EU countries, if I may ask?

      • GolfNovemberUniform
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        Why do you compare it to destroying and rebuilding one of the EU countries, if I may ask?

        Because destroying and rebuilding the digital infrastructure is very similar. It’s extremely expensive and causes a lot of breakages in the process.