Depends on the root setting. And depends on your goal. What is the purpose of the proxy? I doubt that it is easy to bypass, but you still could run a Proxy or VPN as user, this would not bypass the proxy but any filtering/blocking would not be possible. Etc
You can simply just download a binary and run it.
TL;DR - Quantum computing is great, if you’re the bad guy. For the rest of us, there’s a cost/value tradeoff in defending against quantum computing threats. People will tell us it’s too much hassle to upgrade our encryption, but it can be done with reasonable effort.
And a big point is, it is a technology that we have to develop anyway, since big targets like governments, military or big financial or economic companies would want to defend against anyway.
To my knowledge there exists exactly one reactor in china, and this is a test project. We know very little about it. I have seen many many talks in the last 10ish years but for such a “break trough idea” very very little actual physical proof for any of the big claims.
Edit: Wikipedia article of said reactor: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TMSR-LF1
I’m also of the opinion that if a bad actor capable of navigating the linux file system and getting my information from it has physical access to my disk, it’s game over anyway.
I am sorry but that is BS. Encryption is not easy to break like in some Movies.
If you are referring to that a bad actor breaks in and modifies your hardware with for example a keylogger/sniffer or something then that is something disk encryption does not really defend against.
With initramfs and dropbear you can make the password prompt accessible over ssh, so you can enter the password from anywhere.
Edit: For debian it is something like
Full disk encryption on everything. My Servers, PCs etc. Gives me peace of mind that my data is safe even when the device is no longer in my control.
That’s also my take on the topic and that is also what backblazes data is suggesting. Would they not believe it themself then they would stop buying unreliable drives. Every brand can have outlier models that have a bad failure rate.
I use dd.
deleted by creator
Go with the drive with the best money/TB rate that meets your criterias. I would consider everything above ironwolf or red plus fitting for NAS use. Data center drives are in my experience often cheaper than NAS drives. (wd ultrastar or seagate exos or toshiba enterprise capacity)
Look for the warranty. Some times another drive for just a couple of bucks gives you a way longer warranty.
And as backblaze says themselves every time, this data is not.the complete truth either, they have large sample size but this sample size is still too small to large claims about reliability. Especially about brand reliability.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_ramdisk
In Linux systems, initrd (initial ramdisk) is a scheme for loading a temporary root file system into memory, to be used as part of the Linux startup process. initrd and initramfs (from INITial RAM File System) refer to two different methods of achieving this. Both are commonly used to make preparations before the real root file system can be mounted.
As i said 2 different things, initrd was used to create a ramdisk, a block device. Initramfs basically directly offers a filesystem instead of a block device.
systemd has now a interface called systemd-initrd: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/docs/INITRD_INTERFACE.md
initrd was deprecated see here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/14/1508
Initramfs and initrd are 2 different things, the problem where the confusion happens is that initrd is deprecated since a few years.
Now, systemd has implemented an interface called systemd-initrd which basically is initramfs.
I guess here is were the confusion lies. Nowadays everything is initramfs even if it called initrd.
The original initrd differs from initramfs, but it is no longer a thing.
Sorry if i came across a little bit snappy have not had a great week so far.
deleted by creator
That they are 2 different tools. Here
Nope, both do the same thing but they are not the same thing.
Brussels will follow it without question or thought about negative effects on Europe, just because it’s given in Brussels that EU will follow US wherever it goes.
Like it happend with the last tariff’s? Not.
deleted by creator
This is called anecdotal evidence and does not serve any purpose.
Get the best price/performance/capacity/warrenty drive from any of the 3 major brands and you are good.
Look up the backblaze drive analysis to get an idea.