I posted this question because I once saw a tweet that said something like:

“If you use adblock, you don’t care about creator’s point blank”

What is your opinion on this? Do you agree with them?

  • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Of course. And I’ll continue to do so as long as advertisement is detrimental to my online experience. If it wastes my time by forcing me to watch an ad before a video, if it distracts me from reading a text because of animations, if it tries to scam or shock me, I’m better off blocking it. I’m not against advertisement as communication that a useful product or service exists, I’m against advertisement abuse and greed.

    I’ll happily pay for, donate to, or otherwise support services important to me that need and deserve it.

    • dabe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I think your last point is the key. I’ve really learned to appreciate the value and quality of software that I pay for. And I will pay for it, just as people have been paying for things they want/need to use well before computers were a thing. The kinds of ads served up on 95% of the internet are essentially a waste and detrimental to a person’s attention economy.

  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you, as a creator, choose to use advertising to monetize your content you don’t respect the limited lifetime of the people consuming your content or their security or about the way the marketing and advertising industry is destroying our society, such as (not exhaustive, just off the top of my head right now)

    • building a surveillance economy, destroying privacy in the process
    • manipulating people into voting in certain ways that are harmful to them and others
    • protecting harmful products from scrutiny (e.g. tobacco, alcohol, products with too much sugar or fat or low quality ingredients, the car and oil industries, corporate climate change denial,…)
    • encouraging overconsumption both in terms of quantity and in terms of items or services they don’t really need
    • destroying content platforms with their mantra “not advertiser friendly”, leading to dystopian self-censorship on e.g. Youtube

    And then there is the way internet advertising can spread malware and compromise the security of websites in general.

    If you do want to monetize content in other ways there are models such as subscriptions or Patreon-style that are a lot more respectful of the user.

    • Noedel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely. I understand things aren’t for free, but if you make my experience subpar I’m blocking ads.

      I wish more creators would make content available across more platforms.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah, I completely forgot to mention the way the advertising industry has basically ignored every feedback from users for two decades or more by making ads ever more intrusive and obnoxious. They reap what they sow.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use AdBlock (and SponsorBlock on YouTube, and a cookie whitelist and a JavaScript whitelist) because only I decide what to see on my screen.

  • BaumGeist
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, because I don’t like subjecting myself to propaganda and having to hope I’m smart and strong enough to recognize it and avoid succumbing to it.

    “People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you. You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity. Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head. You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs.” - banksy

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I own my computer, and I control what is displayed on it. I can do anything I want to control what is and isn’t on my screen. It is not my problem if the majority of content is reliant on an ineffective monetization method.

    I do wish someone would make an ad block that faked impressions. But it would probably lose the advantages of fast load times, security etc.

  • emptyother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Counter point: Any creator blindly putting random ad networks on their site doesn’t care about their users. Every ad should be vetted and served by the creator, those kinda ads are impossible to mass-block. If an ad swindles a user, it should be the creators reputation thats at stake.

    I stopped having a bad conscience for blocking when one blog who begged promised to not autoplay any audio. The very next day it of course showed a very loud ad, and the creator excused it with “he didn’t have any control over what the advertisement network showed”.

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Adblockers are absolutely necessary because ads are a malware threat, never mind the scams and invasive popups. The cReAtOrS didn’t care enough to ensure advertisements were safe, legitimate, or not horribly obnoxious so they did it to themselves.

    I used to allow ads for certain sites but after malware attempts and scam ads, I block them across the board. If that upsets anybody, go whine to the shady advertises who made this a necessity to browse the web safely.

  • tvmole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    As the de facto IT guy for my family, I block ads on all their computers just as a basic safety measure.

    I can usually spot a fake download button and avoid scammy sites, but my parents and grandparents seem magnetically attracted to them

  • infamousbelgian
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been with this idea for a very long time. But over time all the platforms got more and more greedy and I had the feeling that my privacy got more and more invaded.

    Since that time, I have an Adblock and use DDG.

    Sorry content creators.

    • greenteadrinker@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I remember correctly, you could throw a dollar to the creator’s way and still be ahead of viewers who watch all of their ads.

      And you can still engage their content to hopefully have it reach a wider audience

  • utopianfiat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “If you don’t pledge fealty to your feudal Lord, you don’t care about the artists for which he is patron.”

    I don’t care about creators who demand that I surrender my privacy as the only valid show of support for them.

  • LSlowmotion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well if I want to support creators, I would rather give them my money directly either by buying their merch or any payment plarform.

    Nowadays ads are so intrusive. Also the way ads are delivered by knowing what I prefer is capitalistic at its finest. Not everything that I search are something I want to buy.

    • AaronMaria
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This comment shows “-1” dislikes for some reason and it’s counted as an upvote.

        • AaronMaria
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The curious thing was it had like 3 upvotes and -1 downvote and it counted as 4 total.

  • solitarius@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    • I don’t like getting bombarded with ads.
    • It hides scam ads.
    • If the creator of something makes something I like I prefer to directly donate to them instead of giving up my privacy, and letting a company like google profit of it, and then they only give a small portion to the creator.
    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This “you don’t care about creators” is a sham argument designed to make you feel guilty. I hear this about piracy a lot. “You’re depriving all those blue collar people of a paycheck!” meanwhile the WGA has been on strike for weeks because big studios are screwing them over on pay. It’s the corporate executives that are screwing these people over not some individual who downloaded a torrent or installed an adblocker. One only needs to look at who is funneling all the money into their own pockets and it surely isn’t the general public.

  • M-Reimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use ad blockers everywhere. I hate ads and wouldn’t buy anything advertised there anyway.

    • _cnt0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I avoid ads whereever and whenever I can. If the stuff I can’t avoid is particularly obnoxious, I make a mental note never to buy the product even if I need something of the sort.

  • MrFunnyMoustache
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I stopped caring about the ethics of ad—blocking, I got sick of seeing scams, gambling ads, and shitty mobile games, crappy services that no one actually benefits from, and malware. I have ZERO tolerance for these sorts of ads. If an app has ads, I immediately uninstall it; if a website blocks adblockers, I stop using it.

    The type of ads I might be willing to accept would be contextual ads (rather than personalised ones), and they should be individually vetted by either the content creators, or their community. If I visit a Linux forum, stuff like Linode or Tuxedo Computers would be effective, if I visit a Kendo forum, ads for shinai and other kendo supplies make sense, since we are the target audience, and there is no need to violate people’s privacy for this ad model. These ads would need to be non-intrusive, and not take too much space as well, and not over content, and certainly not staying on the screen as I am scrolling.

    This is why when watching YouTube videos, I block ads, but I don’t block sponsors.

    • Vithar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like to think, If the adds your showing aren’t worth your effort to vet and approve, then they aren’t worth my effort to look at. If you have a real product to plug, plug it in line with your content, get revenue from doing so, leave the casino adds back in the past.