I’m currently working on re-evaluating our search engine selection (reading privacy policies and all that good stuff), to see what to keep, remove, maybe add. I figured I might use some input from lemmy.
- what do you use out of the ones we include? is anyone actually using search engines like qwant and metager?
- do you add any search engine to librewolf?
if you’re curious bout my notes on this -> https://gitlab.com/librewolf-community/settings/-/issues/111
I am using a searx instance.
do you use the default librewolf instance (searx.be) or a different one? I personally have one on my LAN which I use in combination with DDG.
I use https://paulgo.io/ . Works pretty well.
Same here
metager.org atm
I personally use SearX as my primary search engine (one local instance, the default searx.be instance as a fallback). Sometimes, I use one of the following search engines as well, but generally, there is no need for them in my case (for some of them, I retrieve their results with my SearX search, anyway). I rarely get to the point where SearX cannot provide the required and satisfactory results and I have to search with some specific search engine. The search engines I currently have set up in all of my browsers on both desktops and mobile phones are:
- SearX,
- DuckDuckGo,
- StartPage,
- Qwant,
- Metager and
- some specific search shortcuts for a few websites (Wikipedia, Lemmy, …).
I have one Whoogle instance set up too, just for testing purposes, though. And I love the idea of per website aggregated results provided by Gigablast, but Gigablast is way too slow to use regularly. Interesting idea, though.
Whoogle seems to get blocked very often for me, both selfhosted and public. I’m actually thinking whether we should be remove it and put back Startpage because of that.
other than that, google-only results is not my cup of tea, so just like you I mostly have it for testing.
Qwant
how good is it? it’s another one I was looking into removing.
Whoogle seems to get blocked very often for me, both selfhosted and public.
It seems to be the same for me. I used to get timeouts or other errors when testing it. And as far as I can say, it lacks a lot of features I find necessary nowadays (advanced filtering, options etc.). And yeah, if possible, I try to stay away from Google results, or at least mix them with others. Thinking about it, I would be up to remove Whoogle in favour of Startpage.
I actually really liked Brave Search for their results mixed with their own indexing. I have no idea how good Brave Search is privacy-wise (it will not be such a win, I can think), but the results are definitely nice in my opinion.
Qwant
Furthermore, I find myself quite enjoying Qwant in general. The results are good, and the functionality is ample. What I really hate about Qwant is that it is not OSS. Qwant being a European (French) company with respectable reviews (there is always something, of course, but I do not recall that much of a controversy about Qwant) gives it some credibility in my eyes (although, credibility might be a bit too strong of a term). I trust them to some degree, though, for sure. And I used to search Qwant exclusively when I could not find something (especially for national searches) at SearX quickly enough. It worked surprisingly well for me.
The same goes for Startpage (European roots from the Netherlands), for example, but to be honest, If I have to choose between Qwant and Startpage, I would probably go for Qwant. But I did not test Startpage on its own that much, to be honest. It might just be much better than Qwant for all I know. I think I might give it a try for some time…
From my perspective, I would keep Qwant and treat it the same as Startpage, for example. I do not see that much of a difference between these two. I would highly appreciate if anyone here knows more about Startpage or Qwant and point me to some privacy-oriented facts considering these search engines. It would be great to learn more. All I know is just what I have been able to pick up here and there. I lack deeper insight into all of this, sadly.
for evaluation of privacy policy and practices of each search engine you can see the link in OP, I’m done evaluating all of them. Startpage and Brave search actually came out cleaner than Qwant, but overall all of the evaluated ones are very much above average.
I think Startpage main advantage is that it’s a Google alternative, and atm it seems like a more viable one than Whoogle, which we tried to push instead. Brave and Searx are cool, I don’t see much added value that justifies including them by default (if one likes the results just add it manually), so if we were to trim some stuff I would consider them honestly, but I’m not sure either.
To add to the Gigablast mention, they teamed up with freenode to create private.sh search engine… Well, I do not know whether they mean the former freenode (nowadays Libera.Chat), or the new one (the freenode after that debacle with the takeover of freenode). If the latter is the case, well, I would say stay miles away from it. And considering I have not seen any mentions of it anywhere, I would be marginally cautious. It might be all all right, but who knows.
From private.sh How it works site:
Built to be audited
Rather than relying solely on closed technologies, we’ve made a genuine effort to publish our code and to use well known and thoroughly tested open solutions to provide a truly private search experience.
Our website and extension is built with open source technologies and can easily be audited and improved through our open source program (coming soon!).
Well, I do not know, but I have not been able to find the source code, so as far I can tell so far, I cannot believe them.
I will look into this, thanks!
Metager is great. Open-source, nonprofit, private
Currently, Im using duckduckgo. I love the bang feature. Im curious about decentralized engines like searx.
deleted by creator
I’ve really grown to like ddg. I used exclusively searx in the past, but now I mix.
I’m using DDG. I try to like it, but it’s just so bad. Occasionally I have to switch back to Google to find things… except that Google 2022 is not the same as Google 2015. Google 2015 was almost supernaturally good, I could find anything. Google 2022, even ignoring its own self-censorship is nearly as bad as DDG… and I’m not sure if it’s that they give bad search results because they earn more money advertising that way, or if there is some other strategy (or even incompetency) involved.
My theory is that Google search is optimized for the average user who probably wants to see what’s popular instead of exactly what he asked for. And disturbing search results should be avoided too because they upset people and upset people will browse the internet less.
everything but Google really
Sadly I can’t say the same, even though I use my own searx instance which is an aggregator for some of the suggestions here, I regularly find myself using google for more relevant results.
Startpage, Metager and sometimes DDG.
deleted by creator
I use searx disroot instance. There is private.sh which is interesting, there is ecosia.org which I like though they ought to be compliant with LibreJS. Ecosia is essentially bing and tracks ip too but it functions well with tor so I sometimes use it.
Ecosia. I am willing to sacrifice some privacy to support their cause. For sensitive searches I might not want associated with my user profile I usually use duckduckgo through Tor.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
in the end the final decision was:
- keep ddg, ddg lite, searxng, metager, wikipedia.
- remove whoogle, brave, qwant.
- add startpage.
basically, reduce the number of engines by keeping only the most popular ones (nothing against the others, but users can add them manually), and replace whoogle with startpage for google results.
by popular ones I mean the one that were suggested the most in this discussion, so thanks everyone!
