Hey, as far as I know, you can see the modlog for yourself. Find your post (currently a fifth from the top), see the reason for removal and possibly discuss with the participating mod the reason to better understand what has gone wrong and what to avoid in future posts. I do not think you can see the post in your post history, but this is a way to see the original post plus some additional info about the removal, if necessary. (Just my 2c, I have no official standing in this.)
Where exactly? Do you mean i = i + 1;? Yes, that would be the same statement – producing the same result. You could also use i += 1; so you spare one character you don’t have to type (i) – this is used in Python for example, because Python doesn’t use ++ operator for increment, it doesn’t know ++ operator in fact. But it turns out programmers are lazy and increment by one is so often used that some programming languages (such as C or C++) defines ++ operator as even a quicker way to increment by one.
i++ is a simple statement increasing the value of i by one. The statement from the picture does the same thing, the code is just really obfuscated. The boolean value false is usually represented as zero, true as one. Therefore, we have false, negation operator ! makes it true. When we apply the minus operator, the programming language implicitly converts true to 1. Adding minus, we get -1. Operator -= takes the value from the left operand and subtracts from it the value of the right operand. The result is stored to the left operand. Therefore, we have a value in i, let’s say 41, we take the value and subtract -1, making it 41-(-1), get 42 and return the result to i. Here you have your increment of i, i++.
You don’t even need to search for SO (Stack Overflow) specifically. It very often happens to be the first result in your search feed, especially when trying to search for something programming- or tech-related. Thinking about it, I have never searched for something using SO’s own search engine actually.
Hey, this is Python2, isn’t it? That would explain this behaviour, because in Python2, the division would be solved as an integer division (whole numbers division) instead of float division (real numbers division). That means it will perform the division and grab only the whole part of the result number. That is zero in this case. If you add a real part (e.g.: 1000.0) to one of the numbers, the expected result should occur. For example:
10*1000.0/(5*3600)
If you use Python3, your code would return the expected 0.555… without any problem. Btw., I would highly suggest to use Python3 instead of Python2. Python2 is no longer developed and it is discouraged to use it. Nothing would change for you at this stage, but Python3 is where the world lives now.
As far as I know, you have to use something like Add custom search engine extension. I am using SearX this way as a default search engine, and it works flawlessly.
Not necessary with SearX supporting OpenSearch. See @avalos@lemmy.ml’s comment below.
I am using FairEmail myself, but K-9 Mail is really good from what I can remember from the time I was using it.