• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    Fish is by far my favorite shell at the moment. I find it does contextual autocompletion a lot better than any other shell I’ve tried.

  • newhoa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    Fish is my favorite. I can barely do without it. Only downside is some bash commands don’t work on it without modification.

    But I’m also having a ton of fun right now with xonsh which lets you use python and bash together.

  • x2ero@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    indeed, a very short description for a bunch of shells. Could be more verbose…

  • erpicht
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    As @mieum mentioned, FreeBSD does not ship with zsh by default. The user chooses their preferred shell when setting up: csh, tcsh, and sh are the options.

    Also, there are several distinct versions of ksh. Adding which version (of each shell) you tried would be helpful as well.

  • mieum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    You may know Zsh as the default shell for FreeBSD

    I thought on FreeBSD tcsh was default for root and sh was default for other users. Also never realized anyone used dash as a login shell :b

      • pingveno
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think the default shell is very distro dependent. Ubuntu-based distros typically use dash, Arch Linux uses bash, and Alpine Linux uses BusyBox’s compiled in ash shell.

      • mieum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        I believe the original Almquist shell is used on FreeBSD. I know on Debian dash is the sh implementation (afterall it is Debian Almquist Shell), but the default login shell for the root user is bash apparently.

  • Sr Estegosaurio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Cool article, I would like a more in depth technical thing. But still liked it.