Namely, do you think it has a future in the wave of next gen clean energy sources? If you support it, do you think it will always be viable or that it should only be a temporary measure to get us off fossil fuels while our renewable infrastructure grows?
deleted by creator
how do you figure?
deleted by creator
I asked you what was sensational about the links, and you went off on a tangent talking about advancements in technology. I explained why these advancements aren’t really meaningful or promising and now you’re saying I’m trolling you. JFC indeed. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
deleted by creator
The ten year figure is based on the best available science. Practically all the people studying the climate agree that we have around a decade left to take aggressive action. On top of that, we’re seeing that tipping points are being reached faster than expected, and global warming is progressing faster than the models predict.
The fact that you’re not convinced means that you really do need to read about the symptoms more. Understanding the severity of the problem is a prerequisite for finding the appropriate solutions. That much should be obvious.
And I’ve already mentioned the actual solutions that need to happen. We need to start moving towards degrowth and sustainable resource usage. We need to abandon consumerism and growth economy. The solutions are largely social in nature and focusing on technology is fundamentally misguided.