• @TheAnonymouseJoker
        link
        62 years ago

        I encountered some anonymous modern day Nazis that blabbered the same crap. It is going to be tough for everyone from here on.

        • @WhiskeyJuliet
          link
          02 years ago

          You encountered a modern day Nazi who hates National Socialists?

      • @stopit
        link
        42 years ago

        I thought by definition NAZIs would hate socialists…where does this argument come from?

        • @poVoq
          link
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @stopit
            link
            22 years ago

            too funny, I know what NAZI stands for, but I never thought about the “socialists” part of it based on what I was taught of Hitler! But what you say makes alot of sense for back then and perhaps for people’s apparent misunderstanding today.

            • @Draegur
              link
              42 years ago

              Hell, remember the ‘first they came for’ sequence?

              It literally STARTS with “First They Came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out–because I was not a socialist.”

              The NSDAP was also anti-union. The very SECOND line was, “Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out–because I was not a trade unionist.”

              Anti-Socialism and Anti-Union are CORE NAZI PRINCIPLES.

              Now I can’t help but give everyone who is against socialism and against unions the hard side-eye.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          92 years ago

          The argument comes from capitalists who want to scare people away from socialism.

          • @stopit
            link
            42 years ago

            so weird tho! Why don’t people understand what fascism is? I guess nothing surprises me insofar as what people will believe these days.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              82 years ago

              Basically, it comes down to ignorance. This stuff isn’t taught in the schools in the west, and most people can’t even define what capitalism, socialism, communism, or fascism actually are. This is why communists implore people to read theory and history. Education is the first step towards actually acting effectively in one’s own interest.

              • @stopit
                link
                52 years ago

                I went to school in the west! In the US, we take US History (over and over again!) We definitely covered WWII and definitely learned about Fascism. But, yeah, it seems better education could solve alot of problems.

                • ghost_laptop
                  link
                  92 years ago

                  US history taught in schools is probably whitewashing all the genocide they commit and making it look as if they’re the heroes, so it’s no surprise no one knows what fascism is even though the US is exactly that and served as inspiration for literally the nazi Germany.

                  • @stopit
                    link
                    22 years ago

                    So, you are right that we were not taught that we were Fascist - and you are right, alot of US History is whitewashed here. We were actually taught that Italy was Hitler’s inspiration. I am not knowledgeable enough to debate this though, just telling you what we were taught here. But still, we were taught Hitler HATED socialism!

                  • @WhiskeyJuliet
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    That’s actually completely right. You can’t understand WWII without reading about the prior century, especially the history of colonialism.

                    The chief reason WWII happened was because Japan and Germany looked around and saw a US-Anglo global hegemony forming. The British had pretty aggressively expanded their empire world-wide, killing millions along the way, and were using that as economic leverage to bully everyone else. In the US, well, they did the same thing, but throughout the North American continent, and were beginning to expand globally as well.

                    Both Japan and Germany, who previously hadn’t done much colonial expansion, realized they could sit home doing nothing and become feudal states to a US/British alliance, or try carving out their own empires by invading their weaker neighbors like the British and Americans had done. And, of course, they took that chance, which ultimately failed since they started way too late in the game. The US had an entire well established continent of resources, and the British controlled global trade and the world’s largest navy.

                    Ironically, the modern EU, now dominated by Germany, is pretty close to Hitler’s original vision of Europe, albeit without quite as much bloodshed or ethnic “purity”. It’s a continent-spanning political system where almost all of Europe is economically and militarily unified under German leadership. It’s the kind of system Hitler would have made if he hadn’t been such a stupid asshole.

            • @Draegur
              link
              22 years ago

              It’s because the definition of fascism has been intentionally diluted to mean “anything I personally do not like” - especially by people who match the pre-diluted definition.

              But look to the etymology of it:
              Fasces. To bundle or bind.

              Fascists view themselves as the ‘connective tissue’ holding their civilization together and protecting it from nefarious “OUTSIDERS”. This is an illusion that serves only as a surface level justification for destructive actions. In reality it can look an awful lot like a paranoia-based psychological contagion that causes its infested drones to reflexively congregate into an exclusive ‘in-group’ that collectively hallucinates out-groups to scapegoat. Every time an out-group is neutralized, they choose a new out-group to destroy. This will continue until there is no one else lift, whereupon they will form internal factions and start to tear each other apart.

              THAT. IS. FASCISM.

              And it’s existed as long as humanity has, long before we came up with a name for it.

              • @WhiskeyJuliet
                link
                02 years ago

                Fascists view themselves as the ‘connective tissue’ holding their civilization together and protecting it from nefarious “OUTSIDERS”.

                That’s a dangerously broad definition that effectively describes almost every modern political party today. Most people want to protect their community, both from threats internal and external. When Joe Biden talks about his need to protect the “soul of the nation” from an outsider like Trump, that fits your definition exactly. When Democrat activists argue they need to punch conservative political pundits for saying things they don’t like, that fits your definition exactly.

            • @WhiskeyJuliet
              link
              -12 years ago

              Nazis weren’t fascists. Fascism was an Italian political philosophy.

              • @stopit
                link
                12 years ago

                Hitler’s inspiration was Mussolini (originally, it did go south eventually, of course), Nazism is fascism with a racial component added to it. It wasn’t just Italy…there was Spain and Japan that embraced Fascism at that time period.

          • @WhiskeyJuliet
            link
            -22 years ago

            The argument comes from historians who know how to read books and are aware of all the socialist programs the German National Socialists instituted as part of their socialist ideology.

            The idea that the Nazis weren’t socialists comes from sheltered kids who got their entire history education about the early 1900s from Hollywood war movies that depict Germans as either murderous psychopaths or blank faced robots to be gunned down FPS-style by the “good guys.”

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              22 years ago

              The argument does not come from historians. In fact, anyone who’s read a book in their life knows that nazis actively broke up unions, and eradicated socialists and communists. The idea that nazis were socialists comes from idiots.

        • @WhiskeyJuliet
          link
          -22 years ago

          Nazis were socialists. It’s literally in the name. National Socialists. Hitler instituted a ton of government welfare programs for Germans.

          As much as I detest socialists, to be fair to them, Hitler’s brand of socialism was also coupled with jingoism, which called for those socialist programs to be provided for by invading all “lesser” peoples and taking their stuff.

      • @WhiskeyJuliet
        link
        -32 years ago

        Socialists hate being reminded that the National Socialists were, in fact, socialists and believed in things like the “right” to housing, food, healthcare.

        All provided by a benevolent government that definitely would always have their best interests in mind and would never do anything evil.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          22 years ago

          Meanwhile in the real world:

          To impose a full measure of austerity upon workers and peasants, the ruling economic interests would have to abolish the democratic rights that helped the masses defend their modest living standards. The solution was to smash their unions, political organizations, and civil liberties. Industrialists and big landowners wanted someone at the helm who could break the power of organized workers and farm laborers and impose a stern order on the masses. For this task Benito Mussolini, armed with his gangs of Blackshirts, seemed the likely candidate.

          In 1922, the Federazione Industriale, composed of the leaders of industry, along with representatives from the banking and agribusi- ness associations, met with Mussolini to plan the “March on Rome,” contributing 20 million lire to the undertaking. With the additional backing of Italy’s top military officers and police chiefs, the fascist “revolution”—really a coup d’état—took place.

          Within two years after seizing state power, Mussolini had shut down all opposition newspapers and crushed the Socialist, Liberal, Catholic, Democratic, and Republican parties, which together had commanded some 80 percent of the vote. Labor leaders, peasant leaders, parliamentary delegates, and others critical of the new regime were beaten, exiled, or murdered by fascist terror squadristi The Italian Communist party endured the severest repression of all, yet managed to maintain a courageous underground resistance that eventually evolved into armed struggle against the Blackshirts and the German occupation force.

          In Germany, a similar pattern of complicity between fascists and capitalists emerged. German workers and farm laborers had won the right to unionize, the eight-hour day, and unemployment insurance. But to revive profit levels, heavy industry and big finance wanted wage cuts for their workers and massive state subsidies and tax cuts for themselves.

          During the 1920s, the Nazi Sturmabteilung or SA, the brown- shirted storm troopers, subsidized by business, were used mostly as an antilabor paramilitary force whose function was to terrorize workers and farm laborers. By 1930, most of the tycoons had con- cluded that the Weimar Republic no longer served their needs and was too accommodating to the working class. They greatly increased their subsidies to Hitler, propelling the Nazi party onto the national stage. Business tycoons supplied the Nazis with gener- ous funds for fleets of motor cars and loudspeakers to saturate the cities and villages of Germany, along with funds for Nazi party organizations, youth groups, and paramilitary forces. In the July 1932 campaign, Hitler had sufficient funds to fly to fifty cities in the last two weeks alone.

          In that same campaign the Nazis received 37.3 percent of the vote, the highest they ever won in a democratic national election. They never had a majority of the people on their side. To the extent that they had any kind of reliable base, it generally was among the more affluent members of society. In addition, elements of the petty bour- geoisie and many lumpenproletariats served as strong-arm party thugs, organized into the SA storm troopers. But the great majority of the organized working class supported the Communists or Social Democrats to the very end.

          source)

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          72 years ago

          Anybody who knows a modicum of history knows that NSDAP was not socialist in any way, shape, or form. In fact, their main focus was on eradicating communists in Germany.