• k_o_t
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      yeah, i’m convinced that all of this is fake outrage about the ridiculousness of nfts with the sole purpose to advertise it and sell more?

  • Halce
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    I actually thought NFTs get at least somehow watermarked with the buyer’s crypto wallet address inserted into the image, or that the address of purchase on the blockchain is needed to then unlock the final goods… but apparently not even that…

    • null_radix
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      NFT is a non-fungible token, commonly resented as an ERC-721. So it doesn’t intrinsically have anything to-do with images. For example, identifying names like domain names can be represented as an NFT. Or use can use it to authenticate to a service, such as email

  • murky
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    The whole idea of the NFT business is flaunting that you have enough money to buy nonsense, so why would you even bother if someone gets for free what you’ve paid for voluntarily without really needing it anyways