• graphito
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    And that’s it? I’ve been waiting for so long for you to react to liberation of Kherson and that’s the best you came up with?

    My Disappointment Is Immeasurable And My Day Is Ruined

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s pretty incoherent. Russia evacuated the city, and letting Ukraine take it the same way they let Ukraine take other territory earlier. This is not a victory where Ukraine actually defeated Russian army. While that’s happening, Russia is moving in additional 300k troops and destroying Ukrainian power grid as we speak.

      There’s a pretty stark difference between the way Russia and Ukraine conduct this war. Russia always prioritizes preserving the troops and equipment while focusing on strategic gains. On the other hand, Ukraine strategy is driven largely by delivering media victories for their western sponsors.

      As a result, Ukraine is suffering horrific losses of men and equipment without having the ability to replenish either effectively. Ukraine has no domestic military industrial capacity at this point, and relies solely on the dwindling supplies from the west. Meanwhile, much of the able bodied population has already been either drafted or fled the country by now.

      • pingveno
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        additional 300k troops

        How many of those actually showed up? How many fled across the border? How many did Putin later walk back because he realized calling up 50 year olds was a bad look? And how many are so poorly equipped and/or trained that they’re more trouble than they’re worth?

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Every report I’ve seen says that not only did they meet the quota, they also got around 70k volunteers. Russia has over a 100 million people, it’s absurd that anybody would think they couldn’t scrape 300k troops.

          Also, Russian mobilization cut off was at the age 45, while Ukraine just announced a mobilization of anybody under 60. That does give a hint regarding who’s hurting more for troops.

          Meanwhile, literally millions of people have fled Ukraine already, and you seriously think Ukrainian troops are better equipped with their hodge podge of donated weapons from NATO inventories?

      • graphito
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        yeeees-yes-yes, beautiful! Yeah, let me see

        • retaliation is a strategic gain | check!
        • driving away the enemy without a fight is both suffering horrific losses and also doesn’t count not a real victory | check-check!
        • dooming the poorest of civilians to frost death without electricity while not affecting the situation on the battlefield is a real victory (oof, I thought you’re communist!) | CHECK
        • EU will freeze 😞 | Not check! | did you forget to practice your lines? I thought we’ve already gone through this all several times!

        Also-also, can you name a situation where you would (hypothetically of course!) acknowledge ukrainian gains? I really would like to have it on the record to show it to you later

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        It did seem unlikely given that Russia now considers Kherson city to be Russian territory. Please do explain what this changes militarily if Ukraine controls Kherson city.

        • basiliscos
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Please do explain what this changes militarily if Ukraine controls Kherson city.

          Russia will have to recapture Kherson, as it is part of Russia (since Sept. 2022).

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Now that they ran the referendum, they don’t really have a choice in the matter according to their constitution. However, they can do this on their own time. There is no pressing need for Russia to do that right now. But this does tie up Ukrainian troops in order to hold it.

            Russia’s ultimate goal is a military victory and destruction of the Ukrainian army. If they achieve that goal then they will capture a lot more than just Kherson city.