Your ideological fancies about how capitalist rule (which before the rise of revisionism could only have existed under the rule of the nazi-backed KMT) would have gone are completely divorced from any real concrete political understanding of the history.

No, I implied that political form seems to be more or less irrelevant for final economic outcome. The only difference is that Mao killed millions of people and other countries got around without unnecessary deaths and torture.

It’s not a coincidence that the two fastest industrializations and drops in poverty of the 20th century occurred in the USSR and China during the Stalin and Mao periods.

Why is it not a coincidence? Many countries industrialized just as fast under different political programs. Take India, Bangladesh or any other underdeveloped country starting to develop — it all happens fast because they can inherit technology from more developed nations. Even today we see it happen in Africa countries going from no electricity to super cities in two decades.

China didn’t revolutionize the world they just bootstrapped whatever was available to their own ecosystem. They could have done that under any other political system and you could even argue more successfully.

All I’m saying that political flavor of the month isn’t as important as average plebs think.