• thequickben
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve passed on interviews in the past that require me to pick up an algorithms text book. The vast majority of people will never need to write code utilizing any of that. FAANG companies in particular are ridiculous for needing months of study to pass their interviews.

    • mark@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I often wonder if FAANG’s determination to find who can write the best algorithms backfires, and may be the reason a lot of the work they produce seems so over-engineered.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        When your interview processes selects for people who like puzzles then you end up with people writing clever code that looks like a puzzle.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not to mention, even if we put aside relevance, the “sit down and solve this algorithm problem right now while I watch you” interview can be WAY harder for neurodivergent types, and imo (depending on how things are done), can effectively amount to discrimination.

    • glibg10b
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. I can’t think when I’m nervous

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        hmmm… what actually is a linked list…?

        Also, I have never once had to actually implement a linked list in my entire career, outside of a job interview