However I find myself being disagreed with quite often, mostly for not advocating or cheering violence, “by any means possible” change, or revolutionary tactics. It would seem that I’m not viewed as authentically holding my view unless I advocate extreme, violent, or radical action to accomplish it.

Those seem like two different things to me.

Edit: TO COMMUNISTS, ANARCHISTS, OR ANYONE ELSE CALLING FOR THE OVERTHROW OF SOCIETY

THIS OBVIOUSLY ISN’T MEANT FOR YOU.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    You misunderstand me. It’s simply that it’s a GIVEN that those people would advocate violence. There isn’t any need for them to respond. Their position is known.

    It’s like as if I asked if it’s okay to charge over 20% interest on a loan. And all the credit card executives and buy here pay here owners and loan sharks started saying YEAH OF COURSE IT IS!

    I kind of already knew where they stood. It’s the same with you.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yep, I have no interest at all in living under a communist dictatorship. If see you’ve seen another kind of communism, please let me know what it is. I’d love to be informed about it.

        Maybe a lot more violence needs to take place before it works right.

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yep, I have no interest at all in living under a communist dictatorship. If see you’ve seen another kind of communism, please let me know what it is. I’d love to be informed about it.

          PRC, Cuba, USSR, Vietnam, etc. are good examples of societies that were organized along Communist lines, and came with drastic reductions in Poverty and drastic increases in life expectancy and freedom as opposed to previous conditions.

          Maybe a lot more violence needs to take place before it works right.

          What do you mean?

        • Kras Mazov@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah yeah, continue to spout your anti-communist propaganda. You already live in a dictatorship, you’re just to propagandized to realize it.

          The only dictatorship we want is that of the proletariat, as opposed to the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. That is, a true popular democracy.

          Maybe listen to what other people have to say and go read communist theory before saying anything you don’t know about.

          As it stands your position is not left in any stretch of the imagination.

        • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’d love to be informed about it.

          that is a blatant lie. this entire thread is a monument to your willful ignorance.

    • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      The fact that you think communists advocate for violence for its own sake (because you think we’re all bloodthirsty or something), tells us you have no idea what communists views are.

      This is an opportunity for you to learn from others, not close your ears because you’ve been inundated with a lifetime of anti-communist propaganda.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      If all those people disagree with you, what kinds of people do you imagine would say yes? Nancy Pelosi? Chelsea Clinton?

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Well believe it or not, communists and anarchists are a fairly small minority of the group that would be “the left” if you call the other guys “the right.”

        I expect it’s more than two people I could hear from…🙄

        Anyway this post sort of answered the question. The violent talk is coming from socialists, communists, and anarchists here on Lemmy, which have a very unified voice and shout down opposition.

        Although I’m sure if they had anything they had to actually run (like a country) they’d be an absolute horror show of fighting, arguing, and bloodbathing each other until they got to the point where the strongest survived and could impose their vision of utopia on the masses.

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Although I’m sure if they had anything they had to actually run (like a country) they’d be an absolute horror show of fighting, arguing, and bloodbathing each other until they got to the point where the strongest survived and could impose their vision of utopia on the masses.

          China is currently installing the equivalent of 5 nuclear power stations’ worth of solar and wind power every week.

          Meanwhile in the west AOC and Bernie groveled at the feet of the democratic party by endorsing Biden’s genocidal regime and all they got in return was Biden announcing a plan to cap rent increases at 5%, which can only go through if they win the next election… against a fascist candidate who is far ahead of Biden in almost every swing state.

          See why we want revolution?

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          What? What other groups make up the left then? Do they wield political power? Have they ever gotten to wield political power? Because the only left that has ever gotten to wield political power and use it to liberate the working people from capitalist oppression are the ones who were willing to pick up a gun and fight.

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          shout down opposition

          This is a text forum, you can post or comment as much as you like. People chiming in with similar opinions =/= “shouting down opposition.”

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Do you think the Left/Right divide is determined by the absolute median position, or is it determined by actual views, ie a general support for Socialism vs a general support for Capitalism?

          Although I’m sure if they had anything they had to actually run (like a country) they’d be an absolute horror show of fighting, arguing, and bloodbathing each other until they got to the point where the strongest survived and could impose their vision of utopia on the masses.

          Historically false for pretty much every AES country.

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You’re asking leftists, the vast majority of which are Revolutionary. Only listening to a minority of Leftists for their opinion and ignoring the majority only gives you an incomplete and biased view.

    • nephs@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      We’re not advocating violence. Your premise is wrong.

      But we know our adversaries commonly use violence, so we’re aware it exists, and we know we have to prepare for it.

      Are colonialist governments not violent? How do you remove from office a government that commits violence against their people, en masse, to destroy their land with mining operations?

      Concrete example: how would the Congolese vote the French out, when anyone organising peacefully against the French is assassinated?

      The point is not violence. But it would be naive to ignore the violence of our adversaries.