• मुक्त
    link
    -1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Not using a seatbelt will still increase the chance that you are injured. This will put a burden on society.

    As long as I am not property of society, this does not cause a moral problem.

    Asking your estate to pay is useless if you have no money, insurance claims can reach the millions which most people can not afford. Pedestrians and cyclists aren’t and should not need to be insured.

    If I have no money, I can’t get insurance or car either. Also, this is s pragmatic issue, not a moral one.

    • Sr Estegosaurio
      link
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      But the public health care is what pays your wounds if you get wounded bc not wearing a seatbelt. And the public heathlcare is payed by all contributors. So it’s stupid to not wear it, bc you can die or cause a major disaster.

      • मुक्त
        link
        12 years ago

        But the public health care is what pays your wounds if you get wounded bc not wearing a seatbelt…

        No one wants public health care here in India. Public health care is quite inferior on a number of parameters, and having vehicle insurance generally implies access to good private sector health care providers.

        Then again, economic motives here are quite different. A sizeable chunk of population wants to grab more and more share of services paid by all contributors.