• k_o_tM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    4h ago

    40+ comments

    uh oh

    edit: seriously tho, 👌 writeup

    • DessalinesOPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 years ago

      Haha thanks. Its impossible for it not to be controversial, for some reason I’ve found signal fans to be more fanatical in their loyalty to it than most advocates of other privacy apps.

        • DessalinesOPA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Frankly, these are the exact same defenses you hear of companies like apple, who also run centralized services, yet their userbases are utterly convinced of their privacy.

          You can’t just say things like “the evidence against them is circurmstancial”, for centralized services. It all boils down to “gut feelings”, rather than the reproducibility requirements that the self hosted solutions must pass. Don’t trust these companies by default, and never take a pretty ui or branding polish as a stand in for trust.

          Phone number ids, and centralized, us based services wouldn’t be acceptable for any privacy oriented chat app. Signal also shouldn’t get a pass.

    • Helix 🧬@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      uh oh

      It’s a good article :) hope you don’t have to delete comments, but by the looks of it, they’re very civil.

      • k_o_tM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        yeah, i didn’t mean that anything bad is going on, just that it’s a somewhat controversial topic and heated debate is taking place hehe