New gecko based browsers are rare nowadays but this one is especially unique to me because it is more than just “firefox with tweaks” like a lot of the ones I’ve come across. The UI is different, it’s working on custom settings, a new more powerful sidebar, a new theming system, and potentially IPFS/Dat support further down the line. It’s very early in development but it’s still impressive as it is.

  • Zerush
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 years ago

    Error, no FUD, nothing more than entering in the Mozilla page, they give you an Alphabet Inc tracker, among others, if you do not block it. Mozilla has economic relationship with Google, as is easily verifiable.

      • AgreeableLandscape
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        Mozilla Firefox is about as removed from google as you can get while still using web this side of the millennium

        Simple! Get a Mac and use Safari. Mac is certified Unix so it’s way better than that knockoff Linux! /s

        • Werwolf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Safari is using blink, google’s web engine. The only alternative is Mozilla’s Gecko. So we must support it. I hope that there was more alternative because I believe in web engine freedom, but rn our only option is Firefox.

          • LivefromLangley@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            Safari uses webkit unless they changed something big recently, but since blink is a fork of webkit it’s still very similar compared to firefox and gecko.

            • Zerush
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              Blink isn’t a fork of WebKit, it’s a improvement of WebKit, like WebKit is a improvement of KHTML from KDE. Gecko was a trademark of Netscape, first called NGLayout and was adopted by Mozilla in 1998 until today. The underlying problem is that there has not been a development of a new engine for 20 years and all the ones that were there have fallen by the wayside, because they cannot adapt to new web formats. The only ones left, aside from some rudimentary engines in the Text Browsers, are Blink, Gecko, and perhaps a while longer WebKit, before becoming completely obsolete. Safari is already in the benchmarks in performance and compatibility with IE.

              • Zerush
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 years ago

                ???, no, what’s more, Apple requires browser developers to use WebKit in order to be included in the Apple repository. This is why many browser developers who use Blink or Gecko have a lot of difficulties to change their browser for Apple. Apple does not want to lose its monopoly of Safari on its platform, a practice that will cost them dearly sooner or later, as it is a very limited platform in functionality.

                • Werwolf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  You’re right, Apple requires browser to use WebKit on their platform.

                  What I said tho, is that WebKit takes a lot of their code from blink. Blink was created as a WebKit fork. As you probably know, maintaining a modern web engine requires a lot of effort. What WebKit does to keep itself updated is to get the code from Blink removing chromium specific parts. So at the end, WebKit is only a reduced version of chromium.

                  • Zerush
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 years ago

                    Well, more or less, but this practice can be carried on for a season. If Apple does not want to stay on the road, it has to get off the podestal and once and for all accept that WebKit has its limitations, no matter how much they patch it. As I said before, until the old IE almost equals in performance with Safari, while developers look black trying to get a browser for iOS that has a minimum of functionality. Vivaldi’s small team has been trying for several years to get an iOS browser out of the alpha phase, because many of its functionalities do not work in WebKit. Not for nothing has WebKit been forked and improved to create Blink, this work, due to the complexity of a render engine, nobody does, if it was not necessary already at that time. But Apple is Apple, more important design than functionality, design can be charged more expensive.

                    How much do the wheels of your car cost?