IG relies on extensive data collection, maximising time on devices, promoting a culture of over-sharing… certainly not appropriate for 7-yr olds.
Original tweet : https://twitter.com/DuckDuckGo/status/1385591040724422659
IG relies on extensive data collection, maximising time on devices, promoting a culture of over-sharing… certainly not appropriate for 7-yr olds.
Original tweet : https://twitter.com/DuckDuckGo/status/1385591040724422659
It’s disturbing to think of a social network for kids, but a lot of kids are on current social networks, so maybe it could actually be a little bit of a safer place for them.
deleted by creator
Yeah probably they shouldn’t be on social media. I’m just saying that it could be an improvement over the current situation. If children were constantly smoking cigarettes, giving them juuls would arguably be an improvement too.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Nah, vegetarianism is an improvement from the perspective of animal rights. Fewer animals die. If you’re going to be puritan about it then veganism doesn’t help either because you still contribute to animal death by any number of activities, like driving a car and potentially running over a squirrel, or even all the animals that die from oil production. Or what about pest control on vegetable farms.
deleted by creator
If I own ten chickens and I kill and eat three, is that morally equivalent in your mind to owning ten chickens and killing and eating seven?
deleted by creator
I don’t get how it avoids the background issue. You can be principally against killing any chickens and still recognize a situation where fewer chickens die as preferable.