It doesn’t paint a very good picture of the matrix protocol. Does the comparison have any merit?

  • DessalinesA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    That was really biased. They claim that matrix isn’t open spec or open source (both of which are false), not extensible (false), and has no third party clients (false).

    • onlookerOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      I thought as much. There’s a clear bias towards XMPP, though some statements seem objective and factual. Some others are just strange, like the one where it just says “OLM” on a yellow background. Is that good? Bad? Some extra words would have been nice.

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      The Matrix side of the “Open, extensible protocol?” is borderline incoherent.