Apparently SDL-org changed the license of SDL from the LGPL (a copyleft license) to zlib (a permissive license).[1]

I don’t get why SDL-org would make the license change; unless if it’s for popularity.


  1. Older Releases (Check the license in versions before SDL2 and 1.3.) ↩︎

  • @pingveno
    link
    42 years ago

    It sounds like it was to allow static linking in commercial software. Previously, you had to ship a directory of dynamically linked libraries solely because of license restrictions.

    • AmiceseOP
      link
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator