Unlike PostgreSQL, ScyllaDB is not as general-purpose and covers fewer use cases due to its query limitations. It doesn’t have the luxury of rich query capabilities found in PostgreSQL, such as joins, aggregates, subqueries, geospatial queries, and more. Additionally, ScyllaDB does not fully support ACID properties, making it less ideal in terms of consistency and data integrity
This is the most important part of the article imo
This is the most important part of the article imo
Yeah, that is one hell of a caveat