• Marxism-Fennekinism
    link
    152 years ago

    I see it as on the same level of a vegan advocacy organisation working with one of the biggest meat companies in the world. Sure, the vegan org might reduce the suffering of the animals under their control, but that shouldn’t be their goal, complete abolishment of animal agriculture should be.

    • @morrowindOP
      link
      122 years ago

      It’s an apt comparison, but do you want complete abolishment of all forms of telemetry, tracking or advertising? Or perhaps more relevant, is that Mozilla’s goal? I don’t think so. See this post by them.

      • @sasalzig
        link
        62 years ago

        Yes, yes and yes. And Mozilla have been selling out their user’s data since the day they took money from Google.

        This is honestly what annoys me more than anything about Mozilla: they pretend to be champions for privacy, but they aren’t. And people fall for it. They are controlled opposition. They are the social democrats of the privacy world: channeling privacy supporters into their compromise (and compromised) position and painting the radicals as unreasonable dreamers.

        If they were to finally die, that would probably be good for online privacy. A real non-corrupt free software fork of chromium could take off with built-in ad blocking and actually good privacy defaults. Firefox is sucking the oxygen out of the room right now.

        Ultimately all tracking and data collecting besides what’s absolutely necessary needs to be declared 100% illegal. I have no hope Mozilla will help in this fight at all.

        • @TheAnonymouseJokerM
          link
          12 years ago

          Starting from paragraph 2, I could replace “Mozilla” and “chromium” vice versa and your comment would actually hold true.

          • @sasalzig
            link
            12 years ago

            I just think that when Firefox dies, maintaining a chromium fork with Google tracking crap ripped out is going to be way easier than continuing development on Firefox, and can be done by way fewer people.

            • @TheAnonymouseJokerM
              link
              -12 years ago

              Firefox will take down Tor Project with it. Chromium/Blink is that bad. Also, Firefox allows user.js and userchrome.css modifications, something unparalleled in Blink/WebKit world.

              Firefox is not going anywhere. Google is scared of antitrust and antimonopoly lawsuits.

      • @obbeel
        link
        32 years ago

        Is it Mozilla’s goal?

        2020’s Unfck the Internet, by Mozilla:

        "A whole sh*tton of how we communicate is controlled by a few centi-billionaires. That’s a new word for all of us: centi-billionaire. It means worth over $100 billion USD. Each.

        Social networks are using us as much as we use them. They slice and dice us into categories to get micro-targeted. Newsflash: people aren’t “targets” and it’s not cool to create little bubbles.

        Oh and security. If you’re sick of reading about — and getting caught in — one data breach after another, we feel you.

        If you want to get out of this mess, we are with you. Mozilla, the not-for-profit behind Firefox, was purpose-built to make the internet what it can be: an open tool for everyone — the powerful and the weak, the right and the left, everyone."

        https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/how-to-unfck/

        • @morrowindOP
          link
          12 years ago

          I mean of course, Mozilla’s goal has always been to create a better internet, but I don’t think that they think that means removing all telemetry, advertising etc.

    • @GenkiFeral
      link
      32 years ago

      I am vegan and must hope any lessening of suffering happens. I hate hunting, but know that a dairy cow is far more likely to suffer far more than a deer a hunter shot. I’d be willing to negotiate if I knew i could lessen the problem. Case by case, of course. All-or-nothing might make the individual feel holier-than-thou, but the problem is just as bad as before. Idealism is not the same as realism. I’d argue that both can be done - diminish a problem by offering some solutions, but go right back by trying to eliminate that problem.

    • @esi
      link
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • @morrowindOP
        link
        22 years ago

        I agree with you, but this is lemmy, and the majority see radical change as the only way.