• pingveno
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    I remember when our local Occupy group decided to initially operate on a consensus basis. Ever tried to operate 100+ people on a consensus basis? No matter what was proposed, someone didn’t like it and wouldn’t budge. They eventually fell to a mix of infighting and the police clearing out the park they were occupying (which had turned to a mud bath in the mean time).

          • jackalope
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            I mean “anarchism” is an extremely broad label, to the point of almost being as meaningless as calling oneself a leftist or marxist. A lot of anarchists are pro-direct-democracy, which isn’t consensus based. A specific example is the “inclusive democracy” movement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_Democracy

            We have to remember, these labels are all abstractions, they aren’t real concrete relations. They’re just ways that humans divide up and name the world for ease of use.

              • jackalope
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                Basically it’s a framework that defines 4 spheres of democracy: politics, economic, social, and ecological.

                Or roughly speaking, democracy in government, democracy at work, democracy in the home, and democracy in relation to the natural environment.