• @pingveno
    link
    22 years ago

    I remember when our local Occupy group decided to initially operate on a consensus basis. Ever tried to operate 100+ people on a consensus basis? No matter what was proposed, someone didn’t like it and wouldn’t budge. They eventually fell to a mix of infighting and the police clearing out the park they were occupying (which had turned to a mud bath in the mean time).

      • @poVoq
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

      • @jackalope
        link
        22 years ago

        Not all anarchists require consensus.

          • @jackalope
            link
            12 years ago

            I mean “anarchism” is an extremely broad label, to the point of almost being as meaningless as calling oneself a leftist or marxist. A lot of anarchists are pro-direct-democracy, which isn’t consensus based. A specific example is the “inclusive democracy” movement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_Democracy

            We have to remember, these labels are all abstractions, they aren’t real concrete relations. They’re just ways that humans divide up and name the world for ease of use.

              • @jackalope
                link
                22 years ago

                Basically it’s a framework that defines 4 spheres of democracy: politics, economic, social, and ecological.

                Or roughly speaking, democracy in government, democracy at work, democracy in the home, and democracy in relation to the natural environment.